My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04776
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04776
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:13 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:59:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Pitkin
Community
Aspen
Stream Name
Roaring Fork River, Hunter Creek
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Aspen Village GMP Submission
Date
5/30/1980
Prepared For
Pitkin County
Prepared By
Aspen Village
Floodplain - Doc Type
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />REAL ESTATE AFFILIATES <br /> <br />Incorporated <br /> <br />Mr. William P. Stanton <br />May 30, 1980 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />Additionally, the applicant will covenant to your 1979 <br />recommendations as follows: <br /> <br />A. The homesites will not have basements. <br /> <br />B. The homesites' first floors will be at least <br />2 feet above the 100-year water surface elevation. <br /> <br />C. The homesites will not be located less than 15 feet <br />from the 100-year flood boundary as surveyed at <br />the site. <br /> <br />2. The base map of the "I\iverfront Homesites Plan" is the <br />same base map used by the Wright-McLaughlin Engineers <br />report of August, 1976. This mapping is aerial flown <br />1"=200' scale at 5' cOntour intervals, and is the best <br />available mapping from Pitkin County for the site. The <br />Wright-McLaughlin Engineers site specific evaluation <br />will check the accuracy of this mapping. <br /> <br />3. As you highlighted, the placement of wells and septic <br />tanks should be free of any floodplain concerns. The <br />County Sanitary is responsible for reviewing our detailed <br />engineering plans, and he only issue permits when he is <br />satisfied all concerns are addressed. <br /> <br />I hope the additional info~mation will assist you in your <br />1980 review. In summary, t feel we both realize the August, <br />1976, Wright-McLaughlin En~ineers report should only be used <br />as a "preliminary planning guideline," and that detail site <br />specific study is required at the next level of investiga- <br />tion. If the 1980 application is approved at the General <br />Submission level, we will proceed to the site specific <br />technical review level. <br /> <br />If I can be of additional assistance or offer clarification, <br />please give me a call. I hope our modifications and commit- <br />ments will sufficiently address your concerns. <br /> <br /> <br />Si::rc~+? <br /> <br />J' Curtis <br />Re 1 Estate Affiliates <br /> <br />Imp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.