My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04722
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04722
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:47:03 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:55:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Las Animas
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Storm and Flood of July2-3, 1981 Frijole Creek Basin
Date
9/1/1982
Prepared For
Colorado and Southern Railway
Prepared By
Bishop Associates, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SECTION V <br />RUNOFF <br /> <br />The storm described above produced a flash flood of short duration <br /> <br />and high peak discharge which caused the failure of the Colorado and <br /> <br /> <br />Southern Railway bridge over Frijole Creek. Data are insufficient to <br /> <br />establish whether the flood washed the bridge out before or after the <br /> <br /> <br />train arrived at the bridge. <br /> <br />The most significant damage caused by the storm was to the Colorado <br />and Southern Railway bridge. Damage was also caused to other county <br />roads and bridges, and a number of bridges were washed out by the flood. <br />U. S. Highway 160 bridge was closed for several hours by the flood- <br />waters. Erosion damage to lands was considerable in the upper reaches <br />of the basin. Appendix B contains representative photographs of the <br />flood which illustrate the erosion damage and some of the damage to the <br />bridges. <br /> <br />PEAK DISCHARGE <br /> <br />Two methods of computation were used to determine the peak dis- <br /> <br /> <br />charge of runoff from the storm. The first combined the estimated flow <br /> <br /> <br />through the bridge opening using the contracted-opening method and weir <br /> <br /> <br />flow over the railway. This method indicated a discharge between 40,000 <br /> <br /> <br />and 50,000, cfs including approximately 5000 cfs in weir flow over the <br /> <br /> <br />railway tracks. The tracks served as a dam, with the backwater effect <br /> <br />forming a reservoir on the upstream side. Figure 4 is a profile along <br /> <br />the railway tracks, and illustrates the high water marks both south and <br /> <br /> <br />north and the estimated depth of water over the tracks during peak flow. <br /> <br />A second and more reliable estimate of discharge was made at a <br /> <br /> <br />l200-foot reach of generally straight channel approximately one-half <br /> <br />mile downstream from the bridge site using the slope-area method. The <br /> <br /> <br />discharge in Frijole Creek determined by this method was about 48,000 <br /> <br />cfs. The flood through this channel reach was contained on the north <br /> <br /> <br />side of the creek, as evidenced by clear and well defined high water <br /> <br />marks along the hillside above the stream. The flood was not entirely <br /> <br /> <br />V-l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.