Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I' <br />I: <br />I! <br />II <br />I <br />Ii <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />Where appropriate (usually when serious inadequacies exist) <br />include a schedule setting out our expectations of the time <br />needed to resolve the issues. <br /> <br />D. Memo to Headquarters: Prepare a brief memo of <br />transmittal for the Report. Include the community <br />correspondence, Identify all actions required by <br />Headquarters' staff. Mention any issues that HQ staff should <br />be aware of, even if they do not require action at this time, <br />e.g., potential for suspension of a community should <br />follow-up prove ineffective. <br /> <br />Phase V: Implementation of Report Recommendations <br /> <br />A. Introduction: It is the reviewer's responsibility to <br />ensure that all Report recommendations are actively pursued. <br />Most of them will be the direct responsibility of the <br />reviewer, e.g., oversee ordinance improvements, provide <br />technical assistance, etc. But even action on those that are <br />actually performed by others (e.g., map revisions) needs to <br />be monitored by the reviewer. <br /> <br />B. Record Keeping: The reviewer needs to prepare a <br />chronology of events or an activities log on each CAPE. <br />Record ~ll milestones, e.g., initial screening call, <br />telephone interviews with local contacts, date of CAPE visit, <br />dates of Report and correspondence, etc. Keep with the log <br />the original copy of the CRF, copies of the Final Report and <br />associated correspondence, phone memos and all other <br />materials needed to keep you and others involved in the <br />process apprised of in the community's status, <br /> <br />C. Continued Oversight: The CAPE is not concluded until <br />each of the issues documented in the Report Findings is <br />resolved. Upgrading of ordinances is a typical CAPE-related <br />follow-up activity. It can easily take three months to a <br />year or more for the amendment process. The reviewer needs <br />to ensure that local officials pursue such long-term <br />activities. To do so, periodic (monthly or bi-monthly) <br />telephone contacts should be made to each community where <br />issues remain unresolved. Set up some type of "tickler file" <br />arrangement to remind you which communities are due for a <br />call and at what times, Make the calls and record them in <br />your chronology or activities log. If they do not appear to <br />be eliciting adequate response, send a letter to the local <br />contact or the CEO. Again, maintain a positive tone, but <br />make it clear that the community's response has been <br />unsatisfactory. Refer in your letter to your efforts to <br />assist them to our timetable (if one was included in the <br />original correspondence) and to your periodic calls to check <br />progress. Note how much time has elapsed despite your <br />efforts and emphasize the continued lack of progress. If <br />neither the calls nor this letter elicit appropriate <br /> <br />- 27 - <br />