Laserfiche WebLink
<br />;. .. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.......... <br /> <br />.--- <br /> <br />life saving plans and organizations under a sheriff, police, <br />or fire authority that will effectively save lives when <br />extreme events occur. Perhaps their relative isolation has <br />generated a high degree of awareness of local threats and <br />interest in self preservation through preparedness. But <br />most will need rapid and effective support from the State <br />Government to cope with damage assessment and recovery <br />operations if not with lifesaving. <br /> <br />Local preparedness in recent years in general has <br />improved significantly. A broad-scale program of emphasis, <br />including systematic "on-site" preparedness visits and many <br />other assistance techniques has stimulated local thought and <br />effort. Concern with preparedness at the local level is for <br />the most part genuine and growing. Local leadership is <br />demanding a higher level of performance from their prepared- <br />ness officials. There is a strong overall basis for optimism <br />that the preparedness status of most counties will continue <br />to improve. <br /> <br />A concern which detracts from this progress is the <br />continuing reluctance of various political entities to <br />integrate their plans and operational systems, The events <br />described in this study are of such potential magnitude that <br />no town, city or county can expect to cope with a large or <br />moderate scale emergency without assistance, Integration of <br />closely related entities' capabilities is the most cost <br />efficient means of response; State assistance follows after <br />full scale local efforts are committed. <br /> <br />Overall, the enormity and areal spread of the high risk <br />events'described in this study are of such a magnitude that <br />a massive event in a populated area will still' cost many <br />lives. Possibly because of better preparedness, fewer <br />lives may be lost today than would have been lost just a few <br />years ago; but considering rates of growth in high risk <br />areas, this may not be true. Certainly, if growth continues <br />without commensurate stress on preparedness in the most <br />hazardous areas, larger losses in lives and property will <br />eventually occur. The priority of preparedness emphasis <br />should be on those exposed to very high risks -- those who <br />live in canyons, along rivers, below dams and in tornado and <br />earthquake prone areas. Effective preparedness against <br />disaster requires that all entities: <br /> <br />1. Study their own local high risk hazards and relate <br />them to the existing settlement pattern; determine <br />high priority vulnerabilities. <br /> <br />2. Develop plans with sufficient specificity to deal <br />with high priority risks and vulnerabilities; these <br />plans should include life and property saving <br />measures as well as steps towards recovery, <br /> <br />29 <br />