Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-- <br /> <br />since a clear correlation exists between population <br />size and density and the cost of disasters, it follows that <br />Colorado's growth continues to intensify potential costs and <br />vulnerabil i ty. Should the State's population grow in the <br />next decade as rapidly as the last, that is by almost 30 <br />percent, vulnerability will increase dramatically, Lower <br />levels of growth will commensurately increase vulnerability. <br />There is another acute problem additionally inherent to this <br />growth since people are choosing to settle in many areas <br />along the Front Range where extreme events are most likely, <br />This is the high relief (difference in altitude), relatively <br />high rainfall, reg ion of the State. Fairly high intens i ty <br />earthquakes have and can occur again in this area. Tornados <br />occur in the foothills as well as across the eastern plains. <br /> <br />This increasingly high vulnerability along the Front <br />Range and indeed across the State can only be reduced <br />through better preparedness and mitigation -- mainly at the <br />State and local levels. <br /> <br />COUNTY PREPAREDNESS <br /> <br />"- <br /> <br />In general, the nine counties (Denver, Jefferson, <br />Adams, El Paso, Arapahoe, Boulder, Pueblo, Larimer and Weld) <br />that account for 80 percent of Colorado's population have <br />developed plans which bear with considerable specificity on <br />key local hazards. These county plans generally stress <br />responses within unincorporated areas of the county, leaving <br />incorporated entities to develop their own plans. In most <br />cases in these counties, cities have also begun to develop <br />their own reasonably effective plans. Also, many of these <br />entities have held exercises to test their plans. Many have <br />begun to develop recovery plans dealing with such issues as: <br />damage assessment, debris clearance, and temporary housing. <br />Some of these entities in the 80 percent population "slice" <br />have developed effective response systems to carry out their <br />plans and in many cases can cope with emergency situations <br />of fairly large scale without outside help, <br /> <br />Counties, cities and towns which comprise the next 10 <br />percent (up to 90 percent as described on pages 8 and 10, <br />when counties are considered in terms of total population) <br />of the State's population have not progressed quite so far, <br />Many of these entities are still lacking written plans or <br />existing plans lack sufficient specificity. The quality of <br />these plans ranges from excellent to poor. Some have <br />exercised their plans and have dedicated response organiza- <br />tions -- some have paid little attention to preparedness <br />issues. Most of these entities would require State assis- <br />tance in a large or medium scale emergency situation, <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />Many of the entities which comprise the last 10 percent <br />of Colorado's population (when listed in order of total <br />population as described on pages 8 and 10) have effective <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />. ~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />