My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04641
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04641
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:50 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:48:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Denver
Community
All
Stream Name
All
Basin
South Platte
Title
Proposed Hydrology for use in Hydraulic Analysis of FEMA Flood Studies and Restudies
Date
9/1/1989
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
Resource Consultants
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Course. A sizable reservoir serves the irrigation needs of the <br />golf course and inadvertently provides detention storage at <br />point DW 1 on Figure 15.1. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In 1986, the Colorado Hater Conservation Board completed the <br />flood llazard ldentlJls:ation Report for Crystal Creek and Dirty <br />Woman i:reek (CWCB) (Reference 34). This is the only previous <br />study of the basin available for review. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />15.2 <br /> <br />Previous Studies <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The CoIorado Urban Hydro graph Procedure (CUHP) was used for <br />analyzing this watershed In the CWCB. A I-hour event of 1. 90, <br />2.65, and 3.02-inch rainfall depth was used for generating the <br />10-, 50-, and 100-year storms, respectively. SCS soil type <br />within the watershed was assumed 50% "B" and 50% "C" with <br />development resulting In 15% of the basin-area impervious. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Peak discharges resulting from this study are presented in <br />Table 15.1. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />TABU ld....l - SUMHA~Y QI DW PEAK DISCHARGES FROM PREVIOUS REPORTS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />REPORT <br /> <br />DRAINAGE AREA <br />kquaJ:~ mllg!!l <br /> <br />PEAK DISCHARGES .!.!UlU. <br />AT MITCHELL AVENUE <br />lQ 1:13, 50 YR 100 )'R 500 YR <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />CWCB 5.0 <br /> <br />1,230 <br /> <br />2,620 <br /> <br />3,360 <br /> <br />5,800 <br /> <br />15.3 Hydrolo,gic Analysis <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The overall watershed basin boundary used in this analysis was <br />approximately the same as used for the previous study. The <br />basin was further divided into eight subbasins as shown in <br />Figure 15.1. It should be noted that subbasin 8 does not <br />contribute to the flow affecting the study reach, but was <br />included in order to compare results with the CWCB (it is <br />indicated by a dashed line on Figure 15.1). The assumed basin <br />parameters for Input to the TR-20 model are presented in Table <br />15.2. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE 1~ -=- SUMMARY OF DW BASTN PARAMETERS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />SUBBASIN <br /> <br />DRATNAGE AREA <br />~n.l1are miles) <br /> <br />CURVE NUMBER <br />CN <br /> <br />TIME OF <br />CONCENTRATION. Ic <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />I, <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br /> <br />1.19 <br />0.12 <br />0.59 <br />0.35 <br />0.64 <br />0.1,4 <br />0.81, <br />0.81 <br /> <br />67 <br />67 <br />67 <br />67 <br />68 <br />67 <br />68 <br />67 <br /> <br />0.74 <br />0.42 <br />0.78 <br />0.72 <br />0.85 <br />0.60 <br />0.84 <br />1.15 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />61, <br /> <br />R€~OURC€ CON~UlTI\NT~ INC <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.