My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04566
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04566
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:36 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:44:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Community
Boulder
Stream Name
Gregory, Bear Can, Bluebell Can Creeks, Viele Chan
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning Volume 1, Part C
Date
9/1/1970
Prepared For
Boulder County
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br />The constraints included the need for control 1 ing the flooding which <br />would have a one percent chance of occurring In any given year, use of <br />the multi-purpose -- multi-use concept fully to create as many auxili- <br />ary urban benefits as is reasonable, the importance of maintaining and <br />improving the streamside amenities, the fact that the City and County <br />must not be subjected to undue legal 1 iability as a result of flooding, <br />and in general the importance of improving the urban environment which <br />must be stressed in all phases of the work. <br /> <br />During the course of the Master Plan preparation, numerous conflicts <br />arose. A prime example is the treatment of the Bear Canyon Creek channel <br />problem between the NCAR property and Table Me?a Drive. It was here that <br />every effort was made to plan for leaving the stream in its natural COn- <br />dition and util izlng flood plain zoning to accompl ish the needed objec- <br />tives. It was decided to show channel ization in this reach because of <br />the concern for excessive spreading of flood waters and degradation of <br />the alluvial fan. However, it is noted on the drawing that the flood <br />plain alternate still exists. It would be practical if further studies <br />showed that the erosion problem could be overcome and if it was found <br />esthetically acceptable to construct small rubble and mortar retaining <br />walls at selected locations to contain the flooding within reasonable <br />1 imits. <br /> <br />The extent of the proJect calls for policy decisions in regard to the <br />setting of prIorities and perhaps even modification of the plan if de- <br />sired by the citizens. For instance, on Bear Canyon Creek it would not <br />be out of the question to plan for a lower degree of flood protection or <br />to put Bear Canyon Creek lower on the priority list, using the Master <br />Plan in the mean time as a guide for reservIng of right-of-way, con- <br />struction of proper sized bridges and culverts as streets and thorough- <br />fares are built, and construction of portions of the channel as the <br />need for borrow material arIses from time to time. <br /> <br />In essence, the Master Plan was prepared with a strong attempt at <br />fully relating to the other urban subsystems such as traffic, green- <br />belts, open space, sewer and water utilities, and hiking and bicycle <br />paths to encourage less dependence upon the automobile. An example of <br />this has been a minimum six-foot clearance in culverts to permit pedes- <br />trians to cross under maJor thoroughfares. <br /> <br />Of the numerous alternates which were considered, and this Included the <br />poss Ib i llty of a "deep tunnel plan" such as may be pract leal for Boulder <br />Creek from the canyon mouth to east of 30th Street, the Master Plan as <br />presented in this two-volume report represents the best layout for <br />maximum benefIts with the lowest reasonable cost fItting the goals and <br />obJectives establIshed within the framework of the Drainaqe Manual. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.