My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04566
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04566
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:36 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:44:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Community
Boulder
Stream Name
Gregory, Bear Can, Bluebell Can Creeks, Viele Chan
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning Volume 1, Part C
Date
9/1/1970
Prepared For
Boulder County
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />of the importance and functioning of these two drainage systems. The <br />function of the initial system is to handle runoff so that it wil elim- <br />inate inconvenience. Beyond this, however, the maJor system fulfills <br />the main damage-prevention function. The maJor system will operate <br />whether or not it has been designed and whether or not urban Improve- <br />ments are situated wisely in regard to it. In nearly all cases it is <br />economically impossible to provide an initial drainage system of suf- <br />ficient capacity to obviate the need for the maJor drainage system. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The work in this assignment deals exclusively with the major drainage <br />system. The study did not include a review of the initial drainage <br />system. Once the major drainage system is planned, designed and con- <br />structed, the initial drainage system consisting of storm sewers and <br />small channels falls into order more easily. The future cost of storm <br />sewer works In Boulder will be only a small fraction of the amount that <br />would be spent without a good major drainage system. In many places <br />storm sewers will be unnecessary because of the existence of the maJor <br />drainage works. It should be kept in mind that any money spent On <br />maJor drainage will be more than saved in the future because of the <br />savings On the storm sewer systems. <br /> <br />ALTERNATES STUDIED <br /> <br />The basic alternates which were developed and studied and presented to <br />City representatives with advantages and disadvantages ere 8S follows: <br /> <br />I. GREGORY CREEK <br /> <br />1. Upstream from Baseline <br /> <br />Remove old cottonwood up to traIlhead, pave road or stabilize <br />gravel surfacing, re-establish channel from trailhead to Base- <br />line, and develop sedIment retention area immediately up- <br />stream from Baseline Avenue. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2. Baseline to Pennsylvania Avenue <br /> <br />Remove all signIfIcant obstructions and construct road culverts <br />or brIdges where needed. Several private driveways require re- <br />construction over channel. <br /> <br />Several re-alignments are required because of unfortunate home <br />sitlngs. ,orne check dams are required because of the steep <br />average grade of 8 per cent. <br /> <br />3. PennsylvanIa to Boulder Creek <br /> <br />a. 7th Street Conduit Chute. A box culvert or CMP concrete <br />pipe conduit would be laid in 7th Street, with a cross- <br />sectional area of about 80 to 100 square feet.* A debris <br />basin is required west of 7th Street to keep damaging <br />rocks out of the conduIt. A stIlling basin would be <br />constructed on the south bank of Boulder Creek. Low <br />flows would follow existIng channel. <br /> <br />* Planned as 40 to 100 SQ. ft. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.