Laserfiche WebLink
<br />14 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The flood-proofing of existing industrial structures may be feasible. Often <br />these structures are of heavy masonry or concrete construction. Openings can <br />either be sealed permanently or temporary closures can be used. Utilities <br />may be relocated with relative ease. Caution must be employed, however, to <br />ensure that the building is structurally sound before flood-proofing measures <br />are instituted. <br /> <br />The flood-proofing of existing facilities such as power plants, communication <br />centers, pumping stations, sewage treatment plants, etc., should be encouraged <br />if the costs of flood-proofing are not prohibitive. The interruption of these <br />services may disrupt the economy of the entire region. <br /> <br />Internal remodeling of existing structures is subject to the provisions of the <br />State .Building Code and to the Flood-Proofing Regulations for those spaces <br />located below the RFD. As appropriate, the local building official may specify <br />that types of materials to be used for floors, walls, ceilings, and electrical <br />and mechanical systems shall be consistent with the flood-proofing classification <br />of the space. Consultation with the building official prior to preparation of <br />plans and specifications is recommended. <br /> <br />Additions to existing structures shall be only as permitted by the local zoning <br />ordinance. Residential and commercial structures must meet the FP-l classi- <br />fication of the Flood-Proofing Regulations. For other structures, the degree <br />of flood-proofing is determined by the degree of flood protection required to <br />permit its intended use. (See Section 400 of Flood-Proofing Regulations). <br /> <br />While generally encouraged under Federal Insurance Administration policies, the <br />cost of flood-proofing of existing structures may exceed the reduction in flood <br />insurance rates that may be effected, and thus may not be a practical flood-proof- <br />ing application. . <br /> <br />LEVEES AND FLOODWALLS <br /> <br />Levees and floodwalls are alternative methods of protecting buildings, structures, <br />and other development where evacuation of the flood plain, flood-proofing or other <br />damage reduction measures are impractical. The type of barrier selected will <br />depend largely on the proximity of structures to the watercourse, and to soil con- <br />ditions. Minimum design flood protection elevations for urban and non-urban areas <br />and permissible increases in flood stages due to any such works are discussed in <br />NR 89(e) and NR 87(d)(1), respectively. Flood barriers are rarely economical or <br />practical for individual or small groupings of residential and commercial struc- <br />tures due to the high costs of the barriers themselves and the interior drainage <br />facilities that would be required. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources <br />requires that all local flood protection systems be designed and constructed in <br />accordance with current engineering standards and experience. <br /> <br />... <br />