Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SECTIONFIVE <br /> <br />funding Options <br /> <br />Figure 5.1 <br />Compllr-ison of ProjN:red Funding to Low. 'lediulIl. and Full~ Funded Options <br /> <br />560.000.000 <br /> <br /> <br />.., <br /> <br />550.000.000 . <br />540 000 000'" . <br />.. /' <br />530.000,000 <br />$20.000.000 <br />510,000,000 <br />50 <br /> <br />Low <br /> <br />Medium <br /> <br />Fully Funded Current _ <br />Projected <br />Through 2008 <br /> <br />Please note thai the C\VCB be lines that performing site spccific (11,-1\:11) mapping w'irhin <br />some counties should take precedence onr count~ywidc connrsion mapping in )on- priority <br />counties. This is true specifically when comparing areas where- new growth and development is <br />occurring to counties with low populations and 10\\/ population growth that may also face 1mI,' <br />flood hazard risk. <br /> <br />The funding levels listed above were analyzed using the unit costs provided in Appendix 0 and a <br />log nonnal distribution to ddenninc the 80% confidence interval for planning: purposes. As this <br />distribution was applied to the total yearly estimates for all of the tasks listed above. all <br />references in this document to cost estimates per year or tor the entire 5.year program are based <br />upon this 80~''O confidence imerval (to account fi)r uncertalllty in the unit cost estimates for <br />mapping and hydrologic.lhydraulic investigations). The pro-lonna's prcst'nted in Appendix A <br />can be referenced for more specific information. <br /> <br />5.2 PRO-FORMA <br /> <br />Once the funding levels ah\we were defined, cost estimates \vere generated for years 2004-2008 <br />for specilic project activities through the use of a "pro-fonnau. A pro-fomm is defined as a <br />financial projection of expected costs and revenues for a business for a given financial period. <br />The pro-fonnas below lisl project cakgories and project activities by .year. For each projeet <br />activity a low, medium, and fully funded cost is estimated based upon the definitions provided <br />above. These project activities are then totaled tor each project category, which arc then <br />summed to detcnnine the tatallo\\'. medium. and fully funded cost estmlate for each year. <br /> <br />A probability distribution is then applied to these yearly. totals to determine the 15%.65%.80%, <br />and 95% confidence inter,als. as mentioned in the section abtwe. This probably distribution was <br />applied 10 the computed cost estimates mainly to address some of the uncertainly inherent in a <br />large-scale planning effort. where cost estimates from a small sample of data are applied to a <br />large number of individual projects. The 80% confidence interval is used i()[ planning estimates <br /> <br />Colorado Busint'~~ Ca~(' Plan - .\larch 2(JO~ <br /> <br />5-3 <br />