My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04440
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04440
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:14 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:39:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
All
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Colorado Flood Map Modernization Business Case Plan - March 2004
Date
3/1/2004
Prepared For
FEMA
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SECTIONFOUR <br /> <br />Performance Goals <br /> <br />CWCB will endorse the county that already has a DFIRM as a higher priority than the county <br />without a DFIRM. The CWCB prefers to fund certain Site Specific Mapping studies in the order <br />they are presented regardless of the level of funding that is provided by FEMA. Table 4.4 below <br />lists proposed studies for 2007 and 2008. <br /> <br />Table 4.4 - Proposed Map Modernization Studies for Years 2007-2008 <br /> <br /> C ountyw ide Logan 20,504 91.0% 75 Yes <br /> Mapping Summit 23,548 91.5 % 75 Yes <br /> Pi tk in 14,872 91.9% 75 Yes <br /> Archuleta 9,898 92.1 % 75 Yes <br />2007 Ouray 3,742 92.2% 75 Yes <br /> Delta 27,834 92.8% 75 Yes <br /> Rio Grande 12,413 93.1 % 75 Yes <br /> Sit e S pee i fi c Boulder 93.1 % 75 Yes <br /> Mapping Jefferson 93.1 % 75 Yes <br /> R 0 u tte 93.1 % 75 Yes <br /> C ountyw ide Clear Creek 9,322 93.4% 85 Yes <br /> Mapping C ha ffee 16,242 93.7% 85 Yes <br /> o te ro 20,311 94.2% 85 Yes <br /> Montrose 33,432 95.0% 85 Yes <br /> Gilpin 4,757 95.1 % 85 Yes <br /> Morgan 27,171 95.7% 85 Yes <br /> A lam osa 14,966 96.1 % 85 Yes <br /> Prowers 14,483 96.4% 85 Yes <br /> Huerfano 7,862 96.6% 85 Yes <br /> Hinsdale 790 96.6% 85 Yes <br /> LasAnimas 15,207 97.0% 85 Yes <br /> Conejos 8,400 97.2% 85 Yes <br />2008 RioBlanco 5,986 97.3 % 85 Yes <br /> Dolores 1,844 97.4% 85 Yes <br /> Moffa t 13,184 97.7% 85 Yes <br /> Phillips 4,480 97.8% 85 Yes <br /> Lake 7,812 98.0% 85 Yes <br /> Yuma 9,841 98.2 % 85 Yes <br /> Costilla 3,663 98.3 % 85 Yes <br /> S an Juan 558 98.3 % 85 Yes <br /> Ben t 5,998 98.4% 85 Yes <br /> Counties 66,528 100.0 % 85 Yes <br /> Curren tly <br /> NotinNFIP <br /> (1 2) <br />2009 100 <br /> <br />Tables 4.3 and 4.4 above show a dramatic increase in the number of studies that will need to be <br />performed in 2006, 2007, and 2008 as compared to 2004 and 2005. This is due in some part to <br />the population distribution among the counties. In order to simultaneously meet FEMA's <br />performance goals and conform to CWCB's BCP prioritization, the plan above focuses heavily <br /> <br />Colorado Business Case Plan - March 2004 <br /> <br />4-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.