My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04420
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04420
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:10 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:38:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Statewide
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Flood Fight Operations
Date
8/1/1996
Prepared For
FEMA
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Planning for a high water event should begin months before the <br />flood. A good flood emergency plan will contain many elements <br />and functions that must be designed to work cohesively and <br />seamlessly during the emergency phase. The flood emergency <br />plan must also complement other planning documents, such as <br />those created under the provisions of the Superfund Amendments <br />and Reauthorization Act (SARA) to deal with a hazardous material <br />release. It is essential thatlocal flood plans fit into larger regional <br />or state planning programs. This greatly enhances the capability to <br />share resources over an entire watershed or river syStem. Finally, <br />the local flood plan should serve as a basis for private flood plans, <br />such as those created by large riverfront industries and business <br />centers. Together, all planning documents should fit into a <br />seamless response system. <br /> <br />Notes <br /> <br />The outcome of a planning effort should be a network that <br />eventually develops a written document or plan. Flood emergency <br />planning cannot be a singular activity. No one person or agency <br />has the talent, experience, or resource base to write an effective <br />flood emergency plan. A cooperative process is essential for <br />success. Information must be gathered from a variety of sources <br />and the concerns of each planning team member and element can <br />be addressed in the final document. Coordination issues should be <br />solved during the planning process, not when problems arise in the <br />field. These are all important issues and factors to consider during <br />the plan development phase. <br /> <br />The use of a process based planning system will have other <br />benefits. People and agencies involved in the planning process <br />will develop working relationships and trust. In an emergency, the <br />relationships developed during the planning stage can greatly <br />enhance emergency problem solving. Good workin relationshi s <br />can so ease t at es, re uce stress levels, and provide better <br />service to the community. <br /> <br />In many communities, the local emergency management office <br />will coordinate the planning effort. To save time, some planning <br />information and data can be collected and organized before the <br />first meeting of the planning team. The planning coordinator <br />should identify the key players in the planning process and call an <br />initial organizational meeting. <br /> <br />To be effective, the primary planning group should be kept to a <br />manageable size, no more than 15 representatives. Subcommittees <br />can be used to expand the planning team base and to bring <br />specialty sldlls into the system. For example, resource <br />management is a major planning element. A subcommittee may be <br /> <br />Page 3 - 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.