Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SECTION IV <br />HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />HEC-2 MODEL <br />The purpose of the hydraulic analysis in the FHAD is to define the 100- <br />year floodplain and 10-, 50- and 100-year water surface profiles. The <br />methodology used and the results of the analysis are presented in this <br />section. The floodplains and profiles were defined utilizing the dis- <br />charges associated with the projected future development condition and <br />the existing drainage facilities. The hydraulic calculations for this <br />study are available at the offices of the Urban Drainage and Flood Con- <br />trol District (UDFCD). <br /> <br />The floodplains for the tributaries were determined using a computer- <br />ized backwater program titled "HEC-2 Water Surface Profiles". The re~ <br />quired input to the program is the channel cross section (taken from <br />project mapping), the hydraulic properties of each sub-section within <br />the cross section, and the discharge value. The longitudinal spacing <br />of the cross sections varies with channel conditions, but typically the <br />spacing was approximately 500 feet. <br /> <br />Estimates of channel and overbank roughness factors ("n") were made <br />after field investigations of the study area. The typical Manning's <br />"n" value used for the channel was 0.045, with values ranging from <br />0.045 to 0.060. For the overbank areas, Manning's "n" values ranged <br />from 0.045 to 0.080. <br /> <br />The starting water surface elevations for each of the tributaries were <br />critical depth for the 10- and 50-year storms and Big Dry Creek's 10- <br />year water surface for the lOG-year event. <br /> <br />IV-I <br /> <br />The capacities of the existing culvel1s under roadways and railroads <br />were determined in accordance with guidelines set by the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board (CWCB) and UDFCD. Culverts smaller than 36 inches <br />in diameter were considered to be completely blocked during the 100- <br />year event. For culverts greater than 36 inches in diameter, the <br />effective cross-sectional area of the culvert was reduced by an amount <br />equivalent to a 36~inch diameter pipe. <br /> <br />Most existing culverts in the study area are 36 inches or less in dia- <br />meter and consequently were considered fully blocked for the floodplain <br />determination. Hand calculations based on weir~f1ow approximations <br />were made to determine the depth and width of overtopping at roadways <br />and railways embankments. <br /> <br />Discharges and starting water surface elevations for the projected <br />future development condition for the 10-, 50- and 100-year storms were <br />input into the HEC-2 model and water surface profiles calculated. This <br />data was used to plot on the 1" = 100', 2-foOI contour interval mapping <br />the I OO~year floodplain and profile. The appendix to this report con- <br />tains the FHAD drawings. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />INADVERTENT DETENTION AREAS <br />The Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and the <br />ments create areas of inadverdent detention <br />ing from 20 to 150 acre-feet. In all <br />created by these embankments was not <br />tributary peak flows. <br /> <br />Interstate 25 (1-25) embank~ <br />storage with volumes rang- <br />cases, the detention storage <br />considered in determining <br /> <br />However, at two locations, the 1-25 crossing of Shay Ditch and South <br />Fork Preble Creek, the inadvertent detention created by the roadway <br />embankment was considered In the delineation of the floodplain and <br />floodway upstream. At these crossings, significant portions of runoff <br />would be hydraulically disconnected flow (i.e., split flow) rather than <br /> <br />IV-2 <br />