My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04413
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:46:09 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:37:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Improving American River Flood Frequency Analysis
Date
1/1/1999
Prepared By
National Research Council
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. The most critical data sets are the systematic discharge record at Fair Oaks <br />and the associated set of annual maximum three-day rain-flood discharge (corrected <br />for upstream reservoirs). Based on several analyses, including one that relied on a <br />series of three-day estimates of basin-average precipitation, the latter data set appears <br />to be reasonably homogeneous and the apparent increase in the frequency of large <br />flows that it exhibits since 1950 is real. <br />. The three-day mean of the 1862 flood (estimated to be 265,000 cfs) is <br />likely the largest peak discharge on the American River since 1848 (and perhaps <br />since the beginning of the 19th century). This historical information should be used <br />in American River frequency analysis, although there are questions about its <br />accuracy and about its relevance given the potential hydrologic impacts of hydraulic <br />gold mining. <br />. Although the quality of the paleoflood information developed by the U.S. <br />Bureau of Reclamation is excellent, it has two problems. First, explicit use of this <br />information in flood frequency requires the assumption that floods are independent <br />and identically distributed in time or the use of a particular non-independent and <br />identically distributed model. Existing paleoclimatic data call into question the <br />assumption, but are not yet of sufficient quality to allow development of such <br />models. Second, the USBR paleoflood information does not include any information <br />about paleofloods of the magnitudes of greatest interest---discharges with <br />exceedance probabilities from 0.5 up to and beyond 0.002. For these reasons, the use <br />of the USBR paleoflood information was approached with caution. <br />. Meyer's envelope curve of maximum flood discharges is not especially <br />useful to American River frequency analysis. <br />. The two most recent PMF estimates for the American River at Folsom <br />Dam represent reasonable upper bounds on the three-day flood quantile associated <br />with a probability of at most I x 10-3. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />38 <br /> <br />Improving American River Flood Frequency Analyses <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.