Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Data Sources <br /> <br />- <br />37 <br /> <br /> <br />TABLE 2.2 Maximum Peak Discharges on the American River (Unregulated Conditions at <br />Fair Oaks) <br /> <br />Year <br />1862 <br /> <br />Discharge <br />265,000 <br /> <br />Source <br />Bossen, 1941 <br /> <br />1963 <br /> <br />240,000 <br /> <br />1987 Folsom Control Manual <br /> <br />1964 <br /> <br />260,000 <br /> <br />1987 Folsom Water Control Manual <br /> <br />1997 295,00oa <br />a Estimated at Folsom Dam. <br />February 16, 1999. <br /> <br />Roos, 1999a <br />Source: Maury Roos, memorandum to Kenneth Potter dated <br /> <br />Probable Maximum Flood <br /> <br />In October 1996, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, in consultation with the <br />USACE Sacramento District, used HMR 58 to estimate a mean probable maximum <br />storm amount for the American River basin of 29.62 inches (Pick, 1996; NWS, in <br />press). Using loss rates based on saturated soil for unfrozen ground and snow cover <br />for frozen ground, the USBR calculated one- and three-day probable maximum flood <br />discharges of 575,000 and 401,000 cfs, respectively, for regulated conditions <br />upstream. Due to the combined volume of upstream storage and likely extent of <br />occupied storage at flood time, the equivalent unregulated volumes were expected to <br />exceed regulated values by only a few percentage points. In 1997, following the <br />January 1 flood, USACE Sacramento District re-estimated the probable maximum <br />flood for the basin by applying loss rates equivalent to those observed for this large <br />event (0.7 inches loss of 11.8 inches total) to the probable maximum storm derived in <br />1996. The resulting three-day runoff was 29.07 inches and the maximum three-day <br />average flow was 485,000 cfs. <br />PMF estimates for the American River provide some information about the <br />upper tail of the flood distribution. In theory the PMF is the maximum flood that can <br />be expected at a site, the PMF concept is largely empirical, and hence a PMF <br />estimate should be thought of as a very large flood discharge that is highly unlikely to <br />be exceeded. While the committee is unable to specify the distribution of the likely <br />values of the exceedance probability of a PMF for the American River, empirical <br />data suggest that the exceedance probability should probably be smaller than <br />1 x 10-4 and almost surely smaller than I x 10-3. In the case of the American River, <br />the committee decided to use the two PMF estimates as likely upper bounds on the <br />flood quantile associated with a probability of 1 x 10-3. <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />A variety of data are available for use .in flood frequency analysis on the <br />American River. Based on the committee's consideration of these data, it has <br />concluded the following: <br />