Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />".-*''' <br /><{: <br />'.;....~.,i <br />--l. <br /> <br />and then turn east to follow the same al igmnent as the Plan _A levee.. <br />The rai Iroad grade would not have to be raised but the highway grade <br />would be raised 5 feet. This plan would provide protection to an <br />additional 850 acres of irrigated land and 550 acres of dry farm, <br />grazing, and other lands. <br /> <br />c. Plan C.- Plan C would further increase the area protected: <br />by 520 acres of irrigated farmland and 230 acres of dry' farm;'grb'zini, . <br />and other lands. The south bank levee wou Id be 9.6 mi les in length <br />and begin on high ground at U.S. Highway 50 about 5t mi I,es west'.oflas <br />Animas.' From this point, the levee would extend north across:f:l'1e rail- <br />road and continue northeast to fol low the same al ignment as Plan B: <br />The' highway grade wou I d not requ ire chang I ng but the ra I I road grade" <br />wou I d have to be ra i sed 6 feet. A compar I son of benef its and costs of <br />the th.ree plans, as shown on plate 3, indicates that PlanC woul,9'pro- <br />duce a greater excess of benefits over costs than Plans A and B.. C~rves <br />have been plotted, also as shown on plate 3, of the annual benefits.and <br />costs of var I at ions of P I an C I f constructed to prov i de protect Ion <br />aga I nst different discharges on the Arkansas River. As ind'icafedby <br />these curves, the annual charges increase sharply beyond 140,QbOc.t.s. <br />because of the necess i ty for ra i sing the ra I I road br i dge' across -'the <br />Arkansas River and extensive grade changes in the approach to 'the <br />br i dge, but the annua I benef its I ncrease at a more, constant rate, The <br />maximum excess of benef its occurs at about 140;000 c .f.s. In'viey, of <br />the forego i ng, P I an C constructed to prov i de protect i on aga i nst d'l s": <br />charges u'p to 140,000 c.f.s. was selected as the most logical solution <br />to the flood problem at Las Animas and vicinity and .has been ,designated <br />as the Las An i mas Loca I Protect i on Project. ,. <br /> <br />86. SELECTED PLAN OF I MPROVEM: NT . - The se I ectedp Ian of improve- <br />ment consists of 9.6 mi les of levee on theright bank of the Arkansas . <br />River and one mi Ie of levee on the left bank. Appurte'nailt works' Lnc lude <br />levee protective measures; an interior drainage system consisting of <br />outlet structures, a ditch, and ponding areas; a sewage pumping plant; <br />and intake structures for i rr i gat ion cana I s. 'Pert i nent projed "d:ata ' <br />andeng i neer i ng features of the Las An i mas Loca I Proted Ion Project, <br />are given in table 5 and the plan is depleted on plate 2. <br /> <br /> <br />87. The levees would average 12 feet in height on the right bank <br />and I I feet on the left bank, al lowing a minimum freeboard of 4 feet <br />above th,e computed water surface prof i Ie of 140,000 c.f.s. The levee <br />would have! on2 side; slopes and a crown ~idth of 12 feet which would <br />permit access f,or maintenance equipment. The 'right bank levee would <br />be topped with a 6-inch grave I course to provide a lll9intenance rOad. <br />Borrow mater i a I wou 1 d be obta i ned from the dra I nage ditch, 'from, I oca~ ' <br />t ions whe.re channe I clear I ng and stra i ghten I ng are requ i red ,and from <br />other designated borr'ow areas. The overbank areas under and between <br />the ra i I road and highway br i dges wou I d be. cleared to Improve the hy- <br />draulic characteristics of the channel. Flexlble~typebank 'protection <br />wou I d bel P I aced a long the toe of the I,evee through reaches vu I nerab Ie <br />to 'scoLlr. . , <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />R 1/28/64 <br />