Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />84. During the design of each of the three plans, it was found <br />,that to provide protection against discharges greater than about <br />140,000 c.f.s. would entail extensive channel rectification and bridge <br />alterations resulting in a disproportionate increase in incremental <br />costs as compared to the potential benefits. Inasmuch as a discharge <br />ofe 140,000 c.t-s. on the Arkansas River atLas Animas has a probable <br />frequency of occurrence of once In about 360 years, it is considered <br />that protection against such a discharge would be adequate and desira- <br />ble. The probable f low on the Purgatoire River coinc ident with a <br />140,000 c.f.s. flow on the Arkansas River would be about 20,000 c.f.s. <br />Therefore, for the purpose of comparing the merits of the three plans, <br />each was designed for a discharge of 140,000 c.f.s. on the Arkansas <br />River coincident with a flow of 20,000 c.f.s. on the Purgatoire River. <br /> <br />85. Each ,plan inc ludes a short levee on the left bank to prevent <br />Interrupt i on of tratt icon State Highway 194 and U. S. Highway 50 near <br />the bridge. If these two highways were blocked, there would be no <br />feas'i b Ie, access to the north side of the river from Las An i mas and' <br />vice versa. The standard project flood under existing conditions would <br />flood State Hi ghway 194 to a depth of about 6 feet. With the right <br />bank levee of each plan in place, this depth would be increased up to <br />2,feet. The standard project flood also would inundate State High- <br />way 194 at a point near Adobe Creek to a depth of approximately one <br />foot under existing conditions. However, the depth of flooding at this <br />I ocat i on wou I d not be I ncreased by the right bank levee in any of the <br />plans and the frequency of inundation wou Id be much lower than down- <br />stream near the bridge. Traffic could be detoured easi Iy if the <br />highway is flooded near Adobe Creek but detouring would not be prac- <br />ticable near the U.S. Highway 50 bridge; therefore, the left bank <br />leyee is included as an essential item of the plans considered for <br />flood control at Las Animas and vic inity. <br /> <br />-,-.' ,,-- <br /> <br />a. P,I an A. - The south bank levee for P I an A, tota I length <br />7.,0 miles, would begin about two miles southwest of Las Animas, extend <br />northeast across U.S. Highway 50 and the rai Iroad, continue northeast <br />and east around the city, and then turn southeast and tie to high <br />ground near the rai Iroad about It mi les east of the city. The rai 1- <br />road grade at the west snd of the levee would have to be raised about <br />2 feet. u.S. Highway 50 would require a raise in grade of about 7 feet. <br />,The left bank levee would be constructed for a distance of about one <br />mi Ie along the south side of State Highway 194, north of Las Animas, <br />and it would cross U.S. Highway 50 at the intersection of the two <br />highways. Plan A would provide protection to 740 acres of urban and <br />suburban land, 2,800 acres of irrigated land, and 1,190 acres of dry <br />farm, grazing, and other lands. <br /> <br />The south bank levee would be about 8.4 <br />It mi les farther west than the levee in <br />extend northward across U.S. Highway 50 <br /> <br />b.' Plan B.- Plan B would protect a larger area than Plan A. <br /> <br />miles long and begin about <br />Plan A. This levee would <br />and the rai Iroad to the river, <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />R 1/28/64 <br />