My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04322
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
FLOOD04322
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:55 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:32:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Benefit-Cost Analysis for Urban Drainage Planning
Date
3/1/1974
Prepared For
UDFCD
Prepared By
CSU
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />- 4 - <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the analysis. In addition, the engineering investigation must <br /> <br />be completed, including the hydrologic and hydraulic analyses <br /> <br />and the formulation of alternative flood control measures. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Formulation of Flood Control Study criteria <br /> <br />Before the flood control study is undertaken, some cri- <br /> <br />teria must be established. The following are among the ques- <br /> <br />tions that should be considered: <br /> <br />1. Is the desired level of protection fixed or <br />variable? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2. If the level of protection is fixed, will the <br />recommended alternative be the lowest cost, <br />the one that maximizes the net benefits for a <br />fixed cost, or the one that maximizes the net <br />benefits with no constraint on the project cost? <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Will the project financing be fixed or variable? <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Will the study consider only direct benefits or <br />will secondary or indirect benefits be quanti- <br />fied and included? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />5 . <br /> <br />Which secondary benefits will be quantified? <br />Should loss of life be quantified? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Which types of alternatives should be investi- <br />gated? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Other criteria should be set where applicable. The answers to <br /> <br />the above will depend on local preferences and in fact may be <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />specified in the contract. This paper has assumed that the <br /> <br />desired level of protection is fixed, the financing is variable, <br /> <br />and the recommended alternative will be the one that maximizes <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the net benefits with no constraint on the project cost. <br /> <br />~ Leonard R,ceConsulllngWaler Eng"eers.lnc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.