Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />- 20 - <br /> <br />F. <br /> <br />2.25 to cover cost of materials a~d fringe benefits. <br /> <br />Missed Work, Removal of Debri~ and Cleaning - Residen~ial <br /> <br />Land Us_~ <br /> <br />For each residential land use inundated, two days <br /> <br />per unit were es tLnated as necessary to do thf~ cleaning. <br /> <br />The two days were assumed equal to the daily pay of an <br /> <br />employee earn ing $12, O'JO per year. The per day rate was <br /> <br />based upon the 1970 census data on ~edian income adjusted <br /> <br />to fit the specific characteristics of the homes in the <br /> <br />floodplain. This calculdt:Lon also -"as d,=si:Jned to cover <br /> <br />lost income from missed work. <br /> <br />Removal of Debris a~d Cleanin'L::. Commercial Land Use <br /> <br />An estimate of three employees working for four days <br /> <br />was made fo'C each commer.cial unit inundated. An hourly <br /> <br />rate equivalent to that of the going rate of a retail <br /> <br />clerk was used to price the employees' time. <br /> <br />Street, Bridqe and Utility Damaqe Data <br /> <br />Estimates of the nature of the loss and the cost to <br /> <br />G. <br /> <br />H. <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />repair or replace public facilities were made from field <br /> <br />reivew of the floodplain. Recent unit cost data from <br /> <br />various public projects were used in these estimates. <br /> <br />Loss of renters - Multi-familv and Mobile Home Land Uses <br /> <br />The number of rental units which were inundated was <br /> <br />counted and an average monthly rental per unit (apart- <br />Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers.lnc <br />