Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />REPORT OUTLINE <br /> <br />i. Introduction <br />A. Summary of Report <br />B. Purpose of Report <br /> <br />I. Problem Description <br />A. Community Description <br />(briefly describe the community, with emphasis on the flood situation) <br />B. Description of Flooding Problem (includes attached maps and technical <br />documentation) <br />(with anecdotal and engineering information, describe the flooding problem <br />facing the community) <br />. Historic flooding, including 1997 if applicable <br />. Summary of types of flooding problems experienced (i.e bridges & <br />culverts overwhelmed or destroyed, road erosion damage. basement <br />flooding only, substantial damage to buildings) <br />. Table oflocations of specific problems (with accompanying maps) <br />. Hydrologic and hydraulic information <br />. Threatened population and facilities <br />C. Specific Causes of the Problem <br />(identify the causes of the flooding problem in order to guide the generation <br />of appropriate alternative mitigation approaches) <br />D. Unique Circumstances Affecting Flooding in this Community <br />(describe any unique hydraulic, hydrologic, topographic or other <br />circumstances that have a signifU:ant effect on /looding in this community) <br />(i.e. irrigation ditches, culvert & bridge blockage, historic obliteration of <br />channel) <br /> <br />n. Proposed Solutions <br />A. Consequences of no action <br />(what are the flood consequences of doing nothing?) <br />· Include map showing floodplain with "no action" <br />B. List, description and map of each alternative solution <br />(Describe at least 2 alternative mitigation approaches besides "NO <br />ACTION") <br />C. Selection of preferred alternative (using some kind of decision matrix) <br />. Benefits, costs and shortcomings of each alternative <br />. Supporting explanation for choice of preferred alternative <br />