My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04125
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD04125
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:23 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:21:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Interim Procedures for Evaluating Scour at Bridges
Date
9/1/1988
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />I~- <br />, . <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />! . <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.-- <br />I <br /> <br />CHAPTER 2 <br />BASIC CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS OF SCOUR <br /> <br />A. GENERAl <br /> <br />Scour is the result of the erosive action of running water, excavating, and <br />carrying away material from the bed and banks of streams. Different materials <br />scour at different rates. Loose granular soils are rapidly eroded under water <br />action while cohesive or cemented soils are .ore scour resistant. However, <br />ultimate scour in cohesive or cemented soils can be as deep, or deeper, than <br />scour in sandbed streams. Scour will reach its maxi.u. depth in sand and <br />gravel bed materials in hours; cohesive bed materials in days; glacial tills, <br />sand stones and shales in months; limestones in years and dense granites in <br />centuries. Massive rock formations with few discontinuities can be highly <br />resistant to scour and erosion during the lifetime of a typical bridge. <br /> <br />Designers and inspectors need to carefully study site specific subsurface <br />information in evaluating scour potential at bridges, giving particular <br />attention to foundations on rock. <br /> <br />8. TOTAL SCOUR <br /> <br />Total Scour at a highway crossing is comprised of three components. These <br />components are: <br /> <br />1. A~gradation and Degradation. These are long term stream bed elevation <br />c anges due to natural or man induced causes within the reach of the river <br />on which the bridge is located. Aggradation involves the deposition of <br />material eroded from other sections of a stre.. whereas degradation <br />involves the lowering or scouring of the bed of a stream. <br /> <br />2. General Scour and Contraction Scour. This type of scour involves the <br />removal of material from the bed and banks across all or most of the width <br />of a channel. General scour can result from a contraction of the flow, a <br />change in downstream control of the water surface elevation, or the <br />location of the bridge in relation to a bend. In each case, the scour is <br />caused by increased velocities and resulting increased bed shear stresses. <br />The most common form of general scour at a bridge is caused by the approach <br />embankments to the bridge encroaching onto the floodplain and/or into the <br />main channel with resulting contraction of the flow. This type of general <br />scour is commonly known as contraction scour. <br /> <br />3. Local Scour. This type of scour involves removal of material from the <br />channel bed or banks and is restricted to a minor part of the width of a <br />channel. This scour occurs around piers, abutments, spurs, and <br />embankments and is caused by the acceleration of the flow and the <br />development of vortex systems induced by the obstructions to the flow. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.