My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04112
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD04112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:20 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:20:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Nationwide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Desk Reference
Date
10/1/1999
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Section 6: The Application Process <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />'i' <br /> <br />Project Application Checklist (Continued) <br /> <br />Job Aid 6-4 <br /> <br />2. Summary Project Information <br /> <br />J Does the project title adequately describe the proposed measure? <br />(location and project type) <br /> <br />J Has the applicant estimated the total cost of the mitigation measure? <br /> <br />J Has the applicant specified the requested HMGP grant amount <br />(Federal share)? <br /> <br />J Confirm and certify that the project is in conformance with the State Mitigation Plan required by <br />Section 409 of the Stafford Act. <br /> <br />3. Description of the Problem <br /> <br />J Has the applicant written a narrative description of the existing problem that includes a brief <br />narrative description of the existing problem, the location, the source of the hazard, and the <br />history and extent of the damage? <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Description of Applicant's Decision-Making Process <br /> <br />J Has the applicant described the process for selecting the project as the best solution to the <br />problem? <br /> <br />J Are the altemative approaches that were considered listed? <br /> <br />J Has it been confirmed that the selection process used by the applicant was sufficient and <br />included appropriate public notice and involvement? <br /> <br />5. Project Description <br /> <br />J Has the applicant written a narrative description of the mitigation measure? <br /> <br />J Does the application explain how and to what extent the project solves the problem? <br /> <br />J Is there a detailed scope of work with: <br /> <br />. Schematic plans and preliminary engineering specifications? <br />. Explanation if mitigation measure is a functional part of a bigger project? <br />. Property site inventory (especially residential retrofits and acquisitions)? <br />. Building construction date, condition, and renovation history? <br />(if applicable) <br />. Maps of site/location (street, plat, flood, topographic)? <br /> <br />e 'k <br /> <br />Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Desk Reference-Draft <br /> <br />Job Aid 6-4 <br />Page 6.9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.