Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />be saved from further damage. <br /> <br />Jamestown made national news, as the town <br />was completely isolated. Food, water, and <br />medical supplies were brought in by air and <br />three people were evacuated to Boulder Com- <br />munity Hospital. Erosion caused extensive <br />damage to the roads and bridges along James <br />Creek. A temporary road from the Peak to <br />Peak road was installed as road crews took <br />months to repair the road to Boulder. Dam- <br />age was estimated at $101,000. Due to the <br />extensive damage to private homes and public <br />works, Jamestown was declared a disaster <br />area by the Federal Government. <br /> <br />It is clear from this historical reconstruction <br />of the events leading up to, and during the <br />1969 event that the flood was anticipated by <br />many people in the community. The accounts <br />of a slow, steady rainfall, coupled with evi- <br />dence of the gradual rise and fall of both the <br /> <br />James creek and the Little James Creek indi- <br />cate that the event was a C'..eneral R..;n Flood. <br /> <br />Flood Hazard Survey of James <br />Creek <br /> <br />On January 26, 1993, the Colorado Office of <br />Emergency Management (OEM) conducted a <br />survey of all structures located within the <br />100-year floodplain/floodway in Jamestown <br />(See appendix C for floodplain Map). The as- <br />sembling of pertinent information on flood- <br />prone buildings within the floodway is based <br />on field observations conducted at that time <br />and is presented in the table below. <br /> <br />The floodplain survey provides critical data <br />for determining the type of buildings, founda- <br />tion types, and current building conditions in <br />the Jamestown Floodway. This valuable in- <br />formation can be used by the community to <br />assess its future potential for flood damage, <br /> <br />Jamestown 100yr Floodplain Survey <br /> <br />STREET STREET PROPANE 100 yr DISTANCE 1 QOyr FLOOD FIRST FLOOR FLOOD DEP"ll-i <br />NUMBER NAME STREAM OWN. FND. SEP'TlC SECURE FLOOOWA Y FROM CREEK ELEVATION ELEV A TlON FIRST FLOOR <br />.2 MAIN JAMES P B YES YES YES 125 ft, 6878 6877 1 <br />.4 MAIN JAMeS p 8 YES YES' YES 90 ft, 6882 6890 -8 <br />.14 MAIN JAMES P SOG YES NO YES 75 ft, 6890 6888 2 <br />.20 MAIN JAMES P 8 YES NO YES 30 ft, 6894 6885 9 <br />.28 MAIN JAMES P SaG YES NO YES 25 ft, 6897 6896 1 <br />.34 MAIN JAMES P SaG YES NO YES 37 ft, 6899,5 6899.5 0 <br />.40 MAIN JAMES P Crawl YES NO YES SO ft, 6902 6901.5 -0.5 <br />.62 COLO. 94 JAMES P Crawl YES NO YES 131 ft, 6913 6914 -, <br />.66 COLO. 94 JAMES aTY SOG YES YES YES 170 ft, 6916 6915 1 <br />.67 COLO. 94 JAMES P SOG YES NO YES 25 ft, 6918 6917 , <br />.73 COLO. 94 JAMES P Crawl YES NO YES 80 ft, 6921 6921 0 <br />.85 COLO. 94 JAMES P Crawl YES NO YES 37 ft, 6923 6922.7 0,3 <br />#133 COLO. 94 JAMES FED. SOG YES NO YES 37 ft, 6946 6946 0 <br />.167 COLO. 94 JAMES P Crawl YES NO YES 36 ft, 6963 6965.5 -2,5 <br />#175 COLO. 94 JAMES P SOG YES NO YES 75 ft, 6967 6967.5 -0,5 <br />.9 WARD ST JAMES P SOG YES NO YES 30 ft, 6975 6973.5 ',5 <br /> <br />Figure - 10 - 1993 - Flood Hazard Mitigation Survey <br /> <br />9 <br />