My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD04028
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD04028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:45:03 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:17:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Montana
Stream Name
Upper Missouri River
Basin
Statewide
Title
Report of the Flood of June 1964 in the Upper Missouir River Basin in Montana
Date
10/1/1964
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />26. EVALUATION OF URBAN FLOOD DAMAGE <br /> <br />a. Urban Damage. Appraisal was made of each residence on the <br />basis of the estimated value and type of propertyandoontents, and <br />the observed depth of flooding. These appraisals are-aummarized in <br />table 7. <br /> <br />b. Businesa and Industrial Damalte. Owners or managers of <br />cOllllDercial establishments were the main source of information as a <br />basis for business and industrial damage estimates. Information per- <br />taining to inventories, gross revenue, p~rolls, and plant valuations <br />was obtained for detailed analysis of flood damages. Possible losses <br />due to business shutdown, loss of wages, rehabilitation, and other <br />abnormal operations were noted. <br /> <br />c. Other Commercial Damage. Municipal, utility, and transporta- <br />tion losses were obtained through the assistance provided by responsible <br />local officials. Costs of flood fighting, evacuation and welfare ser- <br />vices were obtained from the responsible agencies and applied to relative <br />estimates of rural and urban damages. Estimates for these costs are <br />summarized for each urban center where the expenditure was made. <br />Detailed estimates are shown in table 7. <br /> <br />27. URBAN DAMAGE <br /> <br />a. Great Falls. Flooding in the western part of Great Falls <br />resulted from overflow of the Sun River and backwater effects on the <br />Missouri River caused by high inflows from the Sun River. Combined <br />flooding along the two streams caused a total estimated darnageof <br />approximately $4,410,000. Depths of 10 to 12 feet were noted on <br />several homes located in low lying areas. Residential damage vas <br />estimated at more than $3,160,000 and commercial damage was- estimated <br />at nearly $200,000. Damage to streets -and utilities exceeded $1,000,000. <br />Varying degrees of damage were sustained by 681 homes and 24 business <br />establishments. Approximately 3,000 persons were evacuated from the <br />flooded- arear -1le-SCUe- (#perat:l.on&. - -:!'1oed -:!'ighting,and- veH'=e- as sist1lllce <br />cost about $47,000. <br /> <br />b. Manchester. The small community of Manchester, located about <br />3 miles west of-Great Falls , was almost completely inundated by the <br />Sun_ River to depths up to 7 feet. Twenty homes sustained estimated <br />damages of nearly $47,000. No business estabiisbments are looated in <br />the cOlllllluni ty . <br /> <br />c. Vaughn. Vaughn is located on high ground and sustained no <br />flood damage in the town proper. However, a-new residential area <br />located on the Sun River flood plain south of Vaughn was flooded to <br />an average depth of about 8 feet. Dsmage to 38 homes exceeded $200,000 <br />and street and utility damage added another $40,000. The entire popula- <br />tion of about 150 persons was evacuated from the suburban area. <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.