Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Tuesday, May 19 1:30 - 3 :00 PM Track 5 - Erosion II - Moderator: Vince DiCamillo <br /> <br />A NEWl,Y DEVELOPED EROSION BASED DAM FAILURE MODEL <br />Frank Lan, PhD" Steve Rogers, P,E, ,John Sikora, P,E. <br /> <br />A new methodology for performing flood wave routing associated with an overtopping earthen dam failure was developed, The method <br />includes a combination of a physically based erosional model for simulating the dam failure and the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) <br />unsteady flow model FEQ for routing the flood wave downstream of the dam, The dam failure was modeled as a gradual process of soil <br />erosion caused by an overtopping flood, encountered by resistance of the embankment which is a function of the geotechnical properties <br />of the embankment. Thus, the breach size and time of breach development of the failure would be detennined by the hydraulic forces of <br />the flow and the resistance of the embm1kment. The new methodology takes advantages of the USGS unsteady flow model FEQ' s ability <br />to handle complicated channel cross section profiles and provide more stable solutions, compared with the National Weather Service (NWS) <br />Dambreak model. It will lead to better estimation of the dam failure flood wave, flood inundation limits and better development of <br />emergency planning by better defining the area to be inundated in the event of a dam failure, The new methodology was applied to simulate <br />the failure of earthen dams under extreme stonn events in the Chicago area, and the results are compared with the results obtained by using <br />the more traditional methods such as tile NWS Dambreak model. <br /> <br />ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF VARIOUS SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODELS <br />Jeffrey King <br /> <br />Sediment concentrations for water floods range from 0.4 to 20 percent by volume, Sediment transport models typically predict <br />concentrations at the low end of this range in areas where, intuitively, one would expect higher concentrations, Assumptions made in the <br />development of various sediment transport models are identified, Modification of assumptions which may cause appropriate increases in <br />concentration are discussed. <br /> <br />LOCAL SCOUR OR DEPOSITION AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODELS <br />Mike Conaboy <br /> <br />Sediment transport programs that are most widely used are intended to analyze general aggradation and degradation trends in a stream and, <br />generally, will not properly evaluate local scour or deposition, Adjustments to the elevation of a cross section are made as a function of <br />the water depth or based on an average amount of deposition or erosion. These procedures do not consider spatially varied scour and <br />deposition associated with differences in cross sectional geometry along an alluvial channel. The presence of ridges Or incised areas along <br />the channel can affect the location and amount of sediment movement. This paper will explore situations in alluvial channels where direct <br />application of sediment transport programs may not reveal potential problems associated with local scour or deposition. <br /> <br />