Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Tuesday, May 19 1:30 - 3:00 PM Track 4 - Stormwater Management - Moderator: Karen Kabbes <br /> <br />WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AND FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION <br />Leni Oman and Sandra Stephens <br /> <br />Flood damage is increasing in Washington State. In the winter of 1995 - 1996 alone, the State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) <br />obligated approximately $135 million in federal funds for emergency relief work for both state and federally owned lands, The state's <br />Emergency Management Division (EMD) estimates that the II Presidential disasters in Washington since 1980 have caused close to $258 <br />million in damages to publicly owned facilities covered by federal and state funds; this amount has been matched by nearly $35 million in <br />local funds. This estimates do not include damages incurred by WSDOT, the Corps of Engineers, the NRCS, or private damages covered <br />by insurance companies, so it is easy to assume that total disaster costs are twice the EMD estimate. Tllis talk is designed to introduce local, <br />state, and fuderal officials, consultants, and other interested parties to concepts involved in watershed management strategies, including flood <br />management issues, The location and design of emergency repair projects are key components of comprehensive watershed management <br />and flood control. GIS should be used to inventory emergency repair sites so that investments targeted for future flood control and watershed <br />enhancement can be coordinated with federal emergency repair investments and local watershed management objectives <br />MULTI-OBJECTIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT: PUSIDNG THE EDGE TO GAIN BENEFITS BEYOND FLOOD <br />DAMAGE REDUCTION - Mimi Wagner <br /> <br />Floodplain buyout programs force change in the landscape and create new open space within comrrnmities, The built environment is de- <br />constructed when floodprone homes and businesses are removed, and this type of de-construction is a rare occurrence in American cities, <br />These buyout programs, and the ensuing floodplain l1lllIlllgement programs developed by communities, offer an opportunity to claim benefits <br />beyond flood damage reduction, including social, economic and environmental enhancements. The",: benefits are tremendously rewarding <br />and important to the community experiencing them, but they are not reached through traditional urban open space planning, There is an <br />opportunity to remove "default" land cover patterns through floodplain buyout programs. However, many new uses considered within <br />buyout areas, such as intensive recreation, require the same level of damage and cleanup as the original housing or residential uses, A better <br />solution is to replace the "default" with alternative - "surrogate" - covers and uses. These "surrogates" include remnants of the natural- <br />appearing, original floodplain landscapes: riparian forests, wetlands and prairies, "Surrogates" are also extremely valuable - socially - to <br />the community experiencing them. But they can also be perceived by the urban population as unattractive and abandoned places -- and some <br />communities may be reluctant to include them in their open space planning, This paper focuses on the processes and strategies for shifting <br />the attitudes toward adoption of these surrogate ecosystems within the urban framework, and fiuther explores their role in expanding benefits <br />of traditional floodplain buyout and management prol!fams. <br />MULTI-JURlSDlCTIONAL COOPERATION IN MULTI-OBJECTIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT: GILBERT, <br />ARIZONA - Lonnie K. Frost <br /> <br />The Town of Gilbert is a rapidly developing community in the southeastern portion of the Phoenix metropolitan area. The area has been <br />actively farmed for over 100 years and all natural drainages have disappeared. The elevated structur,e of the major canals and the railroads <br />cause the floodplains in this area. The town has participated with the County Flood Control District to build two regional, multi-use <br />retention basin and park facilities. The cwnulative effects of these, and other facilities, have removed the historic area of town from the 100- <br />year floodplain and significantly reduced the flood hazard areas. Better flood hazard mapping has provided the drainage ways. These <br />drainage areas are landscaped and incorporated into the town's trails system and become a multi-functional asset to the community, This <br />paper will share the town's experiences in partnering with other agencies and developers to accomplish multi-objective floodplain <br />management. <br />INTEGRATED STREAM MANAGEMENT PLANNING: FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY AS AN ORGANIZING <br />PRINCIPLE FOR MULTI-OBJECTIVE, COMMUNITY-BASED STREAM MA.NAGEMENT - Mark Vian <br /> <br />The New Y 011<: City Department of Environmental Protection's Stream Management Program is developing a program to protect NY C' s <br />1600 sq. mile water supply watershed in the Catskill Mountains, It integrates the goals of flood hazard mitigation, stonnwater management, <br />protection of drinking water supply and quality, and enhancement of fisheries habitat and riparian ecosystem function, using a watershed <br />scale assessment offluvia! geomorphology and associated hydrology and hydraulics. The Stream Management Program is encouraging <br />a broad-based consensus for stream stewardship in the watershed, The outreach strategy has included: ]) student internship programs to <br />conduct geomorphic assessments, 2) technical training workshops in geomorphology for the regulatory and engineering professions, 3) <br />stream dynamics workshops for heavy equipment operators who perform in-channel work, 4) multi-objective stream management planning <br />workshops for local planners, and 5) educational programs for the general public. These workshops lay te foundation for the development <br />of subbasin-level Stream Corridor Management Plans (SCMPs), which prioritize stream restoration projects based on Rosgen' s "natural <br />channel stability" concepts. The Stream Management Program coordinates the development of the SCMPs, and acts as clearinghouse for <br />assembling funding from various sources, targeted to diverse management goals, to implement the plans, Community-based monitoring <br />will be used to assess the effectiveness of stability restoration projects, ensuring that knowledge of e,ffective stream management is rooted <br />in the community, <br />