My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03973
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:44:53 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:14:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
293
County
Rio Grande
Community
Del Norte
Stream Name
Rio Grande River
Basin
Rio Grande
Title
CWCB Review Report - Floodplain Management Study - Rio Grande River near Del Norte
Date
9/1/1988
Designation Date
1/1/1989
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Flood Control and F"loodplain Management Section <br /> <br />Community requesting variance: ___________________ <br />Communi ty off i c ial : ________..______________________________._ <br />Date wdtten request received by the Board: _______________, <br />Date of CWCB meeting: _______________________ ________ <br />Affected communi ties notified in wri ting? ___ yes no <br /> <br />FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS ~ ' <br /> <br />(Rule 11) ~ l d V A/ r,f <br />\.-r 1"'-'1 <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR A VAIUANCE <br /> <br />Rule for which variance is requested: <br /> <br />Affected communities: <br /> <br />------------ <br /> <br />Reasons for requests: <br /> <br /> estimated change in elevation: Max/Avg ft N,A, <br />. Estimated change in area: Max/Avg .___ acres N,A. <br />Estimated change in velocity: ~lax/ Avg fps N,A, <br /> Estimated number of people affected: <br /> Estimated number of structures affected: <br /> <br />Other evidence: <br /> <br />Is there good and sufficient cause? <br />Is the request the minimum necessary? <br />Would disapproval cause a hardship? <br />Would approval increase vulnerability? <br />Would approval threaten pub'lic safety? <br />Would approval be expensive? <br />Would approval create a nuisance? <br />Would approval cause fraud? <br />Would approval hide information? <br />Would approval conflict with any law? <br /> <br />yes <br />___ yes <br />yes <br />__ yes <br />yes <br />____ yes <br />yes <br />yes <br />. yes <br />_____ yes <br /> <br />no <br />no <br />no <br />_____ no <br />no <br />no <br />no <br />no <br />no <br />no <br /> <br />,....;.- <br /> <br />------------------..-----.----'-'--~-.~-.---b--~/ c:.(y---(j-q---------~~-':::=~~__, .......... <br />. . .-.~-_."-"'.E""~--.'." ..".".-....' ~:......_.... ,..,r.::,,~~l-------,-.- . . <br />>-----., '-'" ,~_._~ ,-~ >,.~--,......."-,,-,~ l <br />---- RECO~'IMEND[[) ACTION: __ .._ Approvel~ __ _...___ Disapprove <br />Reason for disapproval: <br />Recommended by: <br />Date: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-~---~--_._- <br /> <br />-14-- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.