Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />"' <br /> <br />The combined total coat of the recommended improvement plans is estimated <br />to be 1.4 million dollars (Western ~lQW Path $206,000, Lola park ~ibutary <br />$775,000, Eastern Flow path $401,000). Of this amount, $577,000 1s the cost <br /> <br />of street improvements which the Town of Milliken intends to do so the net <br /> <br />Tabl~ 22. Drainage Improvement Implementation priorities. <br /> <br />cost of drainage improvements is about $800,000. <br /> <br />plan Implementation <br />Implementation of the reoOMmended plans ahould be carried out in 8S <br />deliberate manner 88 financing allows. An implementation plan has been de- <br />veloped which assign priorities to the recommended improvements and phases the <br />construction of the improvements. The cost of each stage of construction 1s <br />shown 1n Table 22. If a plan must be completed 1n its entirety in order to <br />80lve the problem it should not be started unless it has been entirely funded. <br />It is imperative that final design and construotion supervision be carried out <br /> <br /> !'riortty <br /> , <br /> , <br />I , <br />I <br />I <br />I , <br />, <br /> <br />Deaoription <br /> <br />EsUlNltsdCost <br /> <br />Lola !'ark ~ibutary Alternative B4, tire <br />station pond to the Little 'r'nolllpson River <br /> <br />Eastern rlow !'ath Alternativs 2, Big <br />Thompson River to union i>I1cifio R<lilroad <br /> <br />Lola park Tributary Alternat1ve A4, <br />Lola park to ths fire atation pond <br /> <br />Western Flow path Altsrnative 4, weat of <br />Milliken Elementary School to Highway 60 <br /> <br />by a compstent engineering firm. <br />priority must be givsn to improvernents in the areas experiencing the ~st <br />damage. Damage assessment in Chapter V conoluded that 1n Milliken the Lola <br />park Tributary is the most destructive. Hydraulic analysis showed that the <br /> <br />"~~ <br /> <br />$1,364,000 <br /> <br />primary obstruction to flow was the Highway 60 embankment. The Reach B alter- <br />nati"es, whichincludedaolutiona to ponding behind the Ilighway 60 emban kment, <br />are also therooat coet effective (Tabl" 21). tt is recOl1IJnended that <br />Alternati"" E4 be implemented first. <br />As a temporary solution, construction could be planned 1n two phases. <br />The first stage would build the structures necessary to convey flood ~ater <br />from the fire station pond to the Great Western R4ilroad pond. A JO-inch <br />culvert presently provides drainage through the Great Western Railroad <br />embankment. This alone would not be edequate to accomodate the volume of <br />water that would diaeharge into the pond follo~in9 an intense storm. Some <br />storm water would be baeked into the Thompson and ~latte Ditch but since most <br />runoff presently nrains from tnwn via the ditCh, p~blems dlong the Thompson <br />and Platte Ditch downstream of Milliken would not worsen. The second stage of <br />Atlernativ" 84 should follow as eoon ae possible tOlOOvewater frorn the Gres t <br />Western Railroad pond to the ~ttle Thompson River. <br /> <br />$ 237,000 <br /> <br />401,000 <br /> <br />538,000 <br /> <br />206.000 <br />