My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03800
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03800
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:44:23 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:04:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Development of A Drainage and Flood Control Management Program for Urbanizing Communities - Part I
Date
9/1/1978
Prepared By
CSU Environmental Resources Center
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />14 <br /> <br />Regulatory Element of the Drainage Management Program <br />The advantages of the recommended Technical and Financial elements <br />cannot be realized unless the entire drainage management program is <br />packaged within effective regulation. Regulatory legislation that <br />insures the consistent, equitable, and reasonable application of <br />these program elements must be developed. The legislation must be <br />carefully drafted to minimize legal uncertainties that might subject <br />the regulatory program to interpretative court actions. <br />The nature of the hydrologic problem suggests that the regulatory <br />mechanism be invoked at the time that the land alteration is approved, <br />and that the regulatory legislation be drafted to provide for a <br />watershed management approach, This latter suggestion must be tempered <br />with the prevalent socio-political climate, At the present time, the <br />politically practical approach to drainage management is based on <br />local control without any regional or state intervention. In this <br />situation, the writers feel that the first suggestion is best <br />accomplished by incorporating legislation for drainage management <br />within local subdivision regulations. The division of land marks the <br />beginning of the alteration of the land; the developer should at this <br />stage, be required to internalize the drainage-related costs that his <br />land alteration is creating, <br />The writers also suggest a regulatory mechanism that would be <br />appropriate under a more cooperative local/regional/state organization. <br />The mechanism would provide for stronger regional and state control <br />over land development. This approach would combine statewide exper- <br />tise to the benefit of each local community, and would bring to fruition <br />management of entire watersheds. It does, however, require considerable <br />relinquishment of local control to regional or state governments. <br /> <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.