My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03773
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03773
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:28:14 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:03:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Comparison of Flood Hydrologic Estimates in Colorado
Date
5/1/1990
Prepared For
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />INTRODUCTION <br />In the study of flo requency relat' the underlying hypothesis is <br />that there is a relationship between peak discharges and basin area. In <br /> <br />general, there are two methods of determining flood frequency relations. One <br /> <br /> <br />consists of using stream flow-gaging station records and the other uses <br /> <br /> <br />rainfall-runoff relations. Within the state of Colorado there are four major <br /> <br /> <br />river basins; the South Platte, Arkansas, Rio Grande, and Colorado; and <br /> <br /> <br />estimates regarding the magnitude of hydrologic events have been prepared <br /> <br /> <br />using both general methods within each of the four basins. Jarrett and Costa <br /> <br /> <br />(1988) indicated that flood estimates based on streamflow records and <br /> <br /> <br />rainfall-runoff relations are sometimes different. For example, for Clear <br /> <br /> <br />Creek near Golden, Jarrett and Costa (1988) showed that there is between 381. <br /> <br /> <br />and 991. difference between flood discharge magnitudes for selected recurrence <br /> <br /> <br />intervals using weighted streamflow analysis and rainfall-runoff results (U.S. <br /> <br /> <br />Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1984) (Table 1). <br /> <br /> <br />There are over 1000 sites in Colorado where peak discharge magnitudes <br /> <br /> <br />have been estimated. Entering into the problem in Colorado are the different <br /> <br /> <br />applications by various investigators who have used the two general methods, <br /> <br />either the streamflow records or the rainfall runoff relations, to compute <br /> <br /> <br />estimates of flood-frequency magnitudes. When these sites are plotted on a <br /> <br /> <br />graph of area versus discharge there is unexplained randomness in the data <br /> <br /> <br />which cannot be explained solely because of being different hydrologic areas <br /> <br /> <br />(figs 1, 2, 3, and 4). Figure 1 shows the 100 year recurrence interval flood <br /> <br /> <br />estimates for 686 sites in the South Platte River Basin with hand-drawn upper <br /> <br /> <br />and lower maximum discharge envelope curves. For basins with a drainage area <br /> <br /> <br />of 10 square miles, the discharge varies from a lower envelope discharge <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.