Laserfiche WebLink
<br />and subscripts 2 and 50 designate tbe 2-yr and 50-yr recurrence intervals. <br />The preceding concept of taking ratios of precipitation ordinates was utilized <br />to develop representative storms ranging from about the l-yr event to the 500-yr <br />event. A representative So..yr event (with adjustments for drainage area size <br />according to Ref. 8) was used in conjunction with the multiplan.ratio option <br />of HEC-J. Loss rate functions were developed based on those used in the <br />reconstitution analysis for event I (Fig. 1) since the storm rainfall totals and <br />distribution patterns were relatively similar. Seven ratios of the S()..yr storm <br />event were computed for each of the land-use conditions analyzed (1940, 1950, <br />1960, and 1970) and the results plaited in Figs. 2(b) and 3. <br />Fig. 2(b) compares tbe rat.s of change of peak discharge witb time between <br />the specific storm events analyzed and the representative storm events developed. <br />Fig. 3 can be used to modify tbe recorded peak discharge for any panicular <br />year to a peak discharge consistent with 1970 conditions. From the results shown <br />it is apparent that urbanization has a significantly greater impact on the more <br />frequent events. <br />Stankowski (7) developed regional expressions, from data whicb included <br />streamflow records for the Rabway River Basin, relating the annual peak discharge <br />for a given recurrence interval to an index of man-made impervious cover. <br />Application of Stankowski's regional expression yields results that are in general <br />agreement with the HEC-l results shown in Fig. 3. <br />The methodology incorporated in this technical note has just recently been <br />applied in preliminary hydologic investigations. For example, tbe Red Run Drain <br />study (6) utilized similar procedures. In that study the basin model representing <br />past conditions was verified (where adequate data were available) by reconstituting <br />several historical events during each representative time frame. <br /> <br />SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Methods presented in this paper can be used as a guide to determine an <br />existing-condition discharge frequency curve of annual peaks (or peak discharge <br />rates above a given base) when utilizing a single event rainfall-runoff model. <br />The multiplan-ratio option of HEC-I permits 1he user to calculate systematicany <br />the hydrologic response of several storm events for a given set of land-use <br />conditions. The adjustment procedure described herein is also applicable when <br />predicting runoff for estimated future conditions. <br /> <br />ApPENDIX.-REFEAENCES <br /> <br />I. Anderson, D.O., "Effects of Urban Development of Floods in Northem Virginia:' <br />Water Supply Paper 2001, United States Oeological Survey, Washington, D.C., 1970, <br />pp. C-l-C-22. <br />2. H EC-J Flood HyJrograph Package, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Corps of Engineers, <br />Department of tbe Army. Jan.. 1913. <br />3. Hydrologic-Hydraulic Simulation. Railway River Basin, NtwJersey, Preliminary repon, <br />U.S. Army Engineer District, New York, N.Y., 1916. <br />4. Martcns. L. A" "Flood Inundation and Effects of Urbanization in Metropolilan <br />Charlotte. North Carolina," Water Supply Paper 1591. United States Geological Survey, <br />Washington, D.C.. 1968, pp. C-I-C-60. <br />5. Putnam, A. L.. "Effect of Urban Development on Floods in the Piedmont Province <br /> <br />4 <br />