Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Site Comparison and Ranking Process <br /> <br />endangered or threatened plant species, animal habitats, historic or archaeological <br />sites. <br /> <br />. Residents [Residents] - no or limited impacts on residents in the vicinity. <br /> <br />. Maximize Reuse Opportunities [Reuse] - close to potential direct users (e.g. golf <br />courses, parks, greenbelts) of reclaimed water. <br /> <br />. Constructibility [Construct] - few or no construction obstacles, (e.g. drainage/flooding <br />protection required, existing structures on the site). <br /> <br />The CWO rated the eight site selection factors using a dual-paired comparison technique. Two factors <br />were compared against each other and each CWO member selected which of the two was most <br />important and by how much. All possible pairs were presented. This information was analyzed using <br />a computer, and the relative ranking was presented in the profile shown below. <br /> <br /> <br />Profile of Results <br /> <br />I <br />m <br />p <br />o <br />r <br />t <br />a <br />n <br />c <br />e <br /> <br /> <br />FUTURE US <br />LT <br /> <br />CONSTRue <br /> <br /> <br />DAMES & MOORE <br /> <br />Project WAlERS Phase 2 <br />October 1996 <br /> <br />o:\OFF\ 123\OEClDE\WAlERSl .DOC <br /> <br />A DAA'S &MOClAE GIlOUP CXlMMNy <br /> <br />3 <br />