Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Site Comparison and Ranking Process <br /> <br />Perspective <br /> <br />r..od.nVp'Clplny_not""ud~..... <br /> <br /> <br />ttS>d.mlpropo"yown....Gl.n<j,o'. <br /> <br />...11001. <br /> <br />.u"olM>dltlg~ommun'~.. <br /> <br />.<o""mlod.....iOjIm.ne <br /> <br />Finally, the group was asked how long they intended to remain in the area. Nine of the thirteen <br />working group members indicated their intent to remain in the area for over ten years and six <br />indicated they planned to stay in the area over twenty years. <br /> <br />Eight factors were considered for siting the reclamation facility and were defined as foUows: <br /> <br /> <br />. Existing Land Use Compatibility [Existing Use] - with adjacent land uses and zoning. <br /> <br />. Future Land Use Compatibility [Future Use] - with jurisdictional long range plans <br />and with special projects that may be in a planning phase. <br /> <br />. Ease of Land Acquisition [Acquire Land] - type of ownership, and minimal number <br />of landowners, jurisdictions, mining claims. <br /> <br />. Minimize Visual Impacts [Minimize] - screened or buffered by natural or manmade <br />features (e.g. riverbeds, hills, freeways. roads, open space, parks). <br /> <br />. Impacts on Biological/Cultural Resources [Bio/Cultural] - no or limited impacts on <br /> <br />DAMES & MOORE <br /> <br />Project WATERS Phose 2 <br />0ct0b8f'1996 <br /> <br />O:\OFF\ 1 23\DECIDE\WATERS1.DOC <br /> <br />"'c.o.NeJ"MOOAfGllOlJP~ <br /> <br />2 <br />