FLOOD03666 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(2) What can the General Assembly do to improve the state's performance during flood disasters,through the adoption of changes in administrative procedures and through stat.utory or const.itutional enactments? (3) What can the state do to lessen the impact of future diilasters? On the basis of information provided by persons meeting with the 'com- mittl?e, including numerous state, local, and federal officials, as well as material prepared by the staff, the members of the committee have reached the following conclusions and submit the fClllowing rel:ommendations: Wi th respect to performanc1:'s during the June floods, the mem- bers believe that state and local officials and employees merit th~ hiqhl?st of praise for their actions during the emergency brought on by thl? June floods. Similar commendatil:lns are also due federal officials and ;3gencies for their efforts durinl:1 and following the floods. The ou'tstanding performances of organizations such as the American Red Cr()s~, and the Salvation Army also deserve special mentiCln, as do those of the savings and loan associations and those banks and other lending inst:l tutions taking immediate measurE~S to assist their customers who sust,ained damages from the rampaging waters of last Junl~. However, the irrational action of man was Bllso demonstrated du:dng the floods by the arrival of the curious d.uring times when pr,ev,entative or restorative measures were bei.ng taken. These people, eith,er through ignorance or unconcern for the welfare' of others, per- haps always will be present in the event of a disaste,r no matter how larg,e or small. In general, the committee believes that because operations during and following the June flood disasters were cCinducted so well, only the most necessary of changes should be made. On the whole, the General Assembly has already provided most of the machinery which is needed by legislation to meet disasters in this state through such measures as the Disaster Relief Act of 1959 and the Colorado Civil Defense Act of 1950. Specifically, the committel? supports the establishment of a primary emergency operations center at Camp George WE~st near Golden, as is being carried out under the present legislation and appropriations, with one-half of the construction costs being sustained by the federal government. The committee does not believe, however" that a specific office of disaster coordination need. be established by law, nor is any legislation needed to improve prl3sent programs for operations in the event of future disasters other than an amendment to 3-17-3 (I), Colorado Revised Statutes 1963, adding "civil disturbance" to the, definition of "major disaster" in thle Disaster RE!lief Act of 1959, as proposed in Bill A accompanying this report. So far as recovery operati <Dns are concE~rned, the committee recommends the adoption of legislati<Dn to authorize public agenci.es to utilize the temporary use of private,ly-owned equipment during periods xii