My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03503
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:29 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:49:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Community
Golden
Stream Name
Tucker Gulch, Kenneys Run
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning
Date
9/1/1983
Prepared For
Golden, Jefferson County
Prepared By
UDFCD
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. The trailer court area at the Tucker Gulch confluence with Clear <br />Creek for use as a stilling area and debris basin during flooding. <br /> <br />The above factors were considered in preparing the operating and maintenance <br />cost estimates for the Tucker Gulch and Kenneys Run. Unit cost information is <br />provided in Table VI-l and was derived from information contained in a recent <br />paper prepared by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (Ref. 8) and <br />the Phase A Report for CI ear Creek prepared by Wri ght-McLaughl in Engi neers <br />(Ref. 18). <br /> <br />. The area along the improved West Fork Kenneys Run channel through <br />the Golden High School property. <br /> <br />. The state-owned I and and pri vate propert i es associ ated with the <br />construction of the three proposed detention basins. <br /> <br />Other areas requlrlng acquisition are shown on the master plan drawings. <br />Recommendations are also made in the sheet commentaries regarding access <br />rights and easements for maintenance purposes. These recommended easements or <br />maintenance access agreements are not to be considered as recommendations for <br />right-of-way acquisition. <br /> <br />Open Space Planning <br /> <br />Operation and Maintenance <br /> <br />To tie in with regional plans to develop the Clear Creek corridor with parks, <br />recreation areas, open space, bikeway systems and trail systems, similar open <br />space uses are being planned along Tucker Gulch and Cressman Gulch drainage- <br />ways. Details regarding the Clear Creek plans can be found in the Wright- <br />McLaughl i n Engi neers, Phase 8 Report for CI ear Creek, dated September 1982. <br />Open space and recreat i ona I pI anni ng for Tucker Gul ch was factored into the <br />master plan by recogni zi ng the need to acqui re flood-prone propert i es and <br />provide access to areas along the improved channel and in upper undeveloped <br />reaches. The improved fl oodp I ai ns in the upper reaches of Tucker Gul ch make <br />open space planning a most realistic and pracitical solution. <br /> <br />Routine maintenance of improved urban drainageways is of key importance and <br />consists of vegetation mowing, trash and debris cleanups, weed control, and <br />revegetation efforts. The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District <br />recommends that grass-lined waterways be mowed at least three times a year and <br />cut to a height of 4- to 6-inches. Three to five cleanup operations are <br />recommended in the spring and summer months to keep channels clear of serious <br />accumulation of trash and debris. Weed control and revegetation operations <br />should be scheduled as required, based on visual inspection of the drainage- <br />ways. <br /> <br />On the Kenneys Run drainageways, planning for open space uses through the <br />downtown area is unrealistic. In the undeveloped areas above 24th Street, <br />open space uses merit further consideration and can easily be incorporated in <br />land use planning for the proposed stormwater detention basins. <br /> <br />Restoration and rehabilitative work is also considered as normal operation and <br />mai ntenance. Exampl es of restorat i on work i ncl ude detent i on pond mucki ng, <br />trashrack cleaning, rebuilding steep rundowns, tree thinning and cleaning, <br />eros i on repai rs, and I oca I channel gradi ng and shapi ng. Exampl es of <br />rehabil itat i ve work i ncl ude rebuil di ng drop structures, placement of ri prap, <br />establishing maintenance access, and providing protection for box culverts, <br />retaining walls or road crossings. <br /> <br />Water Quality and Erosion Control <br /> <br />In recent years, the concern over the quality of urban stormwater runoff has <br />gained much attention. National recognition of the problem of non-point <br />source pollutants from stormwater runoff was first identified in the 1964 U.S. <br />Public Health Service's publication on the "Po11utional Effects of Stormwater <br />and Overfl ows from Combi ned Sewer Systems". Congress, in recogni zi ng thi s <br />prob I em, authori zed funds under the Federal Water Poll ut i on Control Act of <br />1965 and fo 11 owi ng I egi slat i on for the research, development, and demonstra- <br /> <br />VI-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.