Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-9- <br /> <br />Creek through meetings and on-site investigations. The <br />proposed flood control improvements were thoroughly reviewed <br />with the attorney to provide a thorough insight into the types <br />of measures being considered. <br /> <br />Bibber Creek is available at the UD&FCD. <br /> <br />Soils Investigation <br /> <br />The attorney made certain recommendations and identified <br />certain points which were considered by the decision makers <br />in selecting the type and extent of improvements for Van Bibber <br />Creek. Certain highlights of the legal review include the <br />following: <br /> <br />A review of geology and soils data of the Van Bibber Creek basin <br />was completed as part of the Phase A planning. This review <br />did not uncover any geologic or soils-related problems within <br />the basin which would eliminate the possibility of further <br />consideration of flood control related improvements. From a <br />soils standpoint, it is feasible to proceed with further planning <br />and design of needed drainage facility improvements. <br /> <br />1. A municipality or county governmental entity <br />would be liable for damages negligently caused in <br />the process of altering or improving natural <br />drainageways. <br />2. Restrictions imposed by zoning are within the <br />police power of the state. <br />3. Damages may result from a decision not to improve <br />a drainageway where the decision itself was <br />negligent. <br />4. There is no clear cut legal standard that capacity <br />for a IOO-year storm is sufficient to avoid <br />negligence. <br />5. Irrigation ditches should not be looked upon as <br />having a prescriptive duty to carry off some portion <br />of flood flows. <br /> <br />During the completion of the Phase B portion of the planning <br />study, the firm of R. W. Thompson, Inc., Geotechnical Consultants, <br />was retained to provide a preliminary feasibility investigation of <br />the suitability for constructing dam embankments in the lower <br />part of the basin immediately south of 58th Avenue and upstream <br />of Ward Road. This investigation was authorized and contracted <br />through the UD&FCD. The report, entitled, "Preliminary <br />Feasibility Investigation for Flood Control Embankments, for <br />Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, Colorado", provides detailed engineering <br />and cost data on embankment construction in the lower basin <br /> <br />area, for planning purposes (Ref. 4). <br />is available for review at the office <br /> <br />A copy of the <br />of the UD&FCD. <br /> <br />report <br /> <br />- INTERI/l PLANNING - <br /> <br />A copy of the legal opinion prepared by Moses, Wittemyer and <br />Harrison is provided in the Phase A Report. Also included in <br />the Phase A Report is a copy of the legal evaluation completed <br />by the same firm for the Sanderson/Weir Gulch master planning <br />study, providing opinions on drainage matters also pertinent <br />to Van Bibber Creek. A copy of the Phase A Report for Van <br /> <br />Interim planning covers the preliminary drainageway planning, <br />which was completed as part of the Phase A study. For purposes <br />of information and update, the recommendations which were evaluated <br />and presented in that part of the study are summarized in the <br />following paragraphs. <br />