Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />OVERVIEW, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />The Study <br /> <br />Stormwater management, as viewed in this study, encompasses both control and <br />devel.opmental activities. The "control" activities are principally those of regula- <br />ting local flooding, water pollution, soil erosion and sedimentation; whereas, the <br />"developmental" activities relate to enhancing social values, improving the ecology, <br />physical environment and aesthetics of local areas, and developing beneficial uses <br />of stormwater. <br /> <br />The study was focused on urban and metropolitan areas of the United States. <br />Generally, it was designed to examine current problems that either delay, prevent <br />or frustrate local governments and other public agencies in the timely development <br />of effective and economical stormwater management programs and facilities. Institu- <br />tional problems investigated were those that arise in creating, supporting and <br />operating local stormwater management organizations and programs. Also included <br />were problems associated with technical activities such as planning and engineering, <br />and construction, operation and maintenance of physical facilities. All of these <br />problems can be characterized generally as legislative, legal organizational, <br />administrative, political, jurisdictional, social, env1ronmental, ecological, eco- <br />nomic, financial, scientific and technical. <br /> <br />Of special interest were those problems which develop when the stormwater <br />management arm of a local government or public agency interacts with the private <br />sector, other local public agencies, and various state and federal agencies. In- <br />cl.uded are problems of overlapping jurisdiction and authority, non-uniform policies <br />and regulations within a metropolitan area, disputes concerning the intent of duly <br />enacted legislation, problems in joint-financing of facilities and programs, and <br />others. In the process of investigating the institutional management problems of <br />these local organizations, efforts were made to identify, analyze and evaluate the <br />impacts attributable to the implementation and operation of stormwater management <br />programs and facilities. These impacts can be considered as the secondary effects <br />imposed upon people and/or nature by virtue of the primary activities of the manage- <br />ment organization. They can be classified in four major groups: social, economic, <br />political and physical (environmental and ecological). <br /> <br />The study methodology was founded upon conducting personal interviews in selected <br />urban and metropolitan areas across the United States. Detailed case studies were <br />made in the Denver metropolitan area, and in Cook County, Illinois, Fairfax County, <br />Virginia and the City and County of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Included in the groups of per- <br />sons interviewed were elected officials and staff personnel of local and state <br />governments and other public agencies, personnel of federal agencies, planners, <br />engineers, land developers, lawyers, educators and civic leaders. <br /> <br />Objectives, Purpose and Goal <br /> <br />Objectives of the study were to identify, analyze, assess and report major <br />problems of local governments and public agencies in providing and operating effec- <br />tive stormwater management programs and facilities in urban and metropolitan areas. <br />Solutions applied to resolve such problems were to be investigated in selected <br />~tudy areas. As a corollary to the primary objectives, significant social, economic, <br />