<br />r I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />OVERVIEW, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />The Study
<br />
<br />Stormwater management, as viewed in this study, encompasses both control and
<br />devel.opmental activities. The "control" activities are principally those of regula-
<br />ting local flooding, water pollution, soil erosion and sedimentation; whereas, the
<br />"developmental" activities relate to enhancing social values, improving the ecology,
<br />physical environment and aesthetics of local areas, and developing beneficial uses
<br />of stormwater.
<br />
<br />The study was focused on urban and metropolitan areas of the United States.
<br />Generally, it was designed to examine current problems that either delay, prevent
<br />or frustrate local governments and other public agencies in the timely development
<br />of effective and economical stormwater management programs and facilities. Institu-
<br />tional problems investigated were those that arise in creating, supporting and
<br />operating local stormwater management organizations and programs. Also included
<br />were problems associated with technical activities such as planning and engineering,
<br />and construction, operation and maintenance of physical facilities. All of these
<br />problems can be characterized generally as legislative, legal organizational,
<br />administrative, political, jurisdictional, social, env1ronmental, ecological, eco-
<br />nomic, financial, scientific and technical.
<br />
<br />Of special interest were those problems which develop when the stormwater
<br />management arm of a local government or public agency interacts with the private
<br />sector, other local public agencies, and various state and federal agencies. In-
<br />cl.uded are problems of overlapping jurisdiction and authority, non-uniform policies
<br />and regulations within a metropolitan area, disputes concerning the intent of duly
<br />enacted legislation, problems in joint-financing of facilities and programs, and
<br />others. In the process of investigating the institutional management problems of
<br />these local organizations, efforts were made to identify, analyze and evaluate the
<br />impacts attributable to the implementation and operation of stormwater management
<br />programs and facilities. These impacts can be considered as the secondary effects
<br />imposed upon people and/or nature by virtue of the primary activities of the manage-
<br />ment organization. They can be classified in four major groups: social, economic,
<br />political and physical (environmental and ecological).
<br />
<br />The study methodology was founded upon conducting personal interviews in selected
<br />urban and metropolitan areas across the United States. Detailed case studies were
<br />made in the Denver metropolitan area, and in Cook County, Illinois, Fairfax County,
<br />Virginia and the City and County of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Included in the groups of per-
<br />sons interviewed were elected officials and staff personnel of local and state
<br />governments and other public agencies, personnel of federal agencies, planners,
<br />engineers, land developers, lawyers, educators and civic leaders.
<br />
<br />Objectives, Purpose and Goal
<br />
<br />Objectives of the study were to identify, analyze, assess and report major
<br />problems of local governments and public agencies in providing and operating effec-
<br />tive stormwater management programs and facilities in urban and metropolitan areas.
<br />Solutions applied to resolve such problems were to be investigated in selected
<br />~tudy areas. As a corollary to the primary objectives, significant social, economic,
<br />
|