Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Little Rock, Arkansas is said to receive, annually, more federal funds than are <br />collected in federal taxes from the local people and business enterprises. <br /> <br />A philosophy and policy of "no-growth" are sometimes supported, or promoted, <br />by local politicians as solutions to the ever-expanding urban problems in rapid <br />growth areas. Most times, such actions are pursued in desperation and can best be <br />described as temporary "political" solutions. Such means have appeal to some poli- <br />ticians because problem growth can be halted promptly; whereas corrective solutions <br />may require several years for financing, engineering and contruction. <br /> <br />Maintenance <br /> <br />Very few local governments have a planned, continuous program for maintaining <br />their stormwater systems. Maintenance crews usually have additional responsibili- <br />ties and perform stormwater maintenance only when problems occur. In some areas, <br />the sanitary sewer maintenance crews and equipment are used to maintain stormwater <br />drainage facilities, and efforts are made to record the costs separately so that <br />revenue from sanitary system service charges is not used for stormwater system main- <br />tenance. Maintenance is poor-to-fair in most areas, mostly due to the lack of pro- <br />grammed operating funds. Also, the lack of right-of-way or easements along streams <br />and drainage ditches compound maintenance problems. Usually, municipalities now <br />require easements along the drainageways in new land developments, even in in- <br />stances where there may be no public responsibility for maintenance. The difficult <br />problem is to obtain these easements in previously developed areas because many <br />property owners prefer that the streams remain in their natural states--without <br />disturbing the banks, vegetation, trees, brush, etc.--and they are reluctant to <br />grant easements. <br /> <br />Implementation Guidelines <br /> <br />The following suggestions are presented to serve as a guide to representatives <br />of local public agencies and engineering firms in planning and implementing storm- <br />water management programs. <br /> <br />1. Adopt a regional approach, where appropriate, for solving and preventing <br />the problems of drainage, flooding, erosion, sedimentation and pollution. <br /> <br />2. Develop masterplans for entire watersheds, when feasible, based upon <br />accurate field data and inputs from local residents and interested organizations <br />representing them. <br /> <br />3. Establish goals and objectives for meeting present and future requirements <br />imposed by federal, state and local authorities. <br /> <br />4. <br />soc ial <br />future <br /> <br />Determine and analyze the nature and extent of the local physical, economic, <br />and political problems associated with runoff, and attempt to estimate the <br />extent and consequences of these problems if solutions are not provided. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Develop design criteria compatible with the masterplan. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Develop detailed plans based on the masterplan and criteria. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Develop a strategy for financing and implementation. <br /> <br />8. Enact legislation needed to implement the adopted policies, criteria, <br />administrative directives, and plans. <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />