My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03407
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03407
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:11 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:44:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Basin
Statewide
Title
Stormwater Management in the United States - A Study of Intsitutionl Problems, Solutions and Impacts
Date
9/1/1980
Prepared By
Office of Water Research and Technology
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Drainage costs can be extremely important to a land developer in determining <br />his profit. Because drainage facilities are. (mostly) non-visible, prospective <br />purchases of real estate usually do not include the drainage system in their pur- <br />chase evaluations. Accordingly, drainage facilities constitute one item of con- <br />struction that many land developers regard lightly. They often "shop" from one <br />governmental jurisdiction to another to attain the most favorable conditions pos- <br />sible in respect to zoning, land development, and building regulations. The appeal <br />of increased tax revenues often weakens local officials' strict adherence to land <br />use policies and land development codes. The resulting competition between local <br />governments tends to fragmentize and reduce the effectiveness of areawide approaches <br />to stormwater management. <br /> <br />"No growth" policies and moratoria on land development are detested by most <br />land developers. Under such conditions, developers find that financial difficulties <br />can produce bankruptcy or force them to move their operations to other areas. This <br />problem developed in the mid-1970's in Fairfax County, Virginia during an 18-month <br />moratorium imposed on new land development throughout the County. Virtually, all <br />new construction stopped. Not only did land developers suffer, but builders and <br />sub-contractors also experienced severe hardships. Thousands of tradesmen were <br />laid off, or sought employment elsewhere. <br /> <br />Public Education and Responsibility <br /> <br />Perhaps the most neglected phase of solving stormwater problems is the education <br />of the local citizens. The public should be informed of the comparative annual <br />costs of recurring damages versus the annual cost of improvements. They should <br />also be educated about the need for a service charge or a fee so that a stormwater <br />management program can be established to prevent many costly future problems. Ever- <br />expanding urbanization is making it necessary for the citizens to accept stormwater <br />management as a public utility. The public needs to be educated to accept responsi- <br />bility, including "financial" responsibility, for the operation of a stormwater <br />management system. Even though they may not have any direct problems, everyone <br />should understand that stormwater does flow into the drainage system from their <br />yards, roofs, driveways, patios and sidewalks. Further, they should develop an <br />understanding of how each piece of real estate contributes to the problems of <br />flooding, pollution, erosion and siltation. <br /> <br />Very few areas have a good public information or community relations program. <br />Those that do have found it helpful in making the public aware of the municipality's <br />needs and in obtaining their support, especially for improvement bond programs. <br />The citizens should be given the facts; then, most of them will support worthy pro- <br />grams. Many public improvement bond programs have failed in the past because of <br />poor public relations. Public officials hesitate to attempt these programs now <br />because of past failures; however, many persons expressed the opinion that needed <br />programs should be proposed again. They should be fully publicized and the public <br />should be informed truthfully of the needs and costs. Too often the officials are <br />afraid of public reaction and do not put forth their fullest, sincere efforts. <br /> <br />Several persons interviewed in this study stated that many persons firmly <br />opposed to stormwater projects in the past became strong supporters when they were <br />fully informed and when they were "listened to" as they expressed their ideas and <br />opinions. There is a need to be flexible and realistic, and public officials <br />should be open-minded. In some municipalities, neighborhood organizations have been <br />formed, and regular meetings are held. These meetings provide a forum for the <br />municipal staff to present the needs of the municipality and an opportunity for <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.