Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A-1 Hydrology Discussion <br /> <br />A-1.1 The Basin Model <br />The Beta Tes.t Version of HEC-1 (February 1990) for MS-DOS <br />compatible class microcomputers .ms u~;ed to develop a <br />rainfall-runoff and channel routing model for the Kiowa Creek <br />Basin. The unit hydrograph method, with Snyder's coeffi- <br />cients, was used in this application. The parameters Cp and <br />ct were obtained from the corps publication "Water and Land <br />Resources Management Study Vol. V Appendix H, 1977". The pa- <br />rameters, developed for that:: study, were based upon previous <br />Corps studies of the adjacent Cher:ry Cree!k Basin. Tp, for <br />each subbasin, was compute!d from ct and basin geometry. <br />Rainfall values were taken from Page 4 of Appendix F of the <br />"Wiggins 0 &M manual, 1989". Those values were checked <br />against the data listed in "NOAA Atlas 2 Vol. III, 1973". <br />Infiltration rates were based on the soil infiltration map; <br />"Missouri Basin Interagency Committee Gene!ralized Soil Infil- <br />tration Map, 1966". Subbasin infil1:raticm rates used ranged <br />from 0.7 to 2.5 inches per hour. According to the map, the <br />greatest infiltration rates occur in the lower portion of the <br />watershed, including Rock Cre!ek. Infiltration rates, in this <br />area, range from 2.0 to over 6.3 inches per hour. Infiltra- <br />tion rates of from 1.9 to 2..5 inches per hour were selected <br />for subbasins in, and bordering, this area and were used in <br />the model. The lowest infilt.ra.tion rates were given for the <br />portion of the basin upstream of Hiqhway 52. According to <br />the map, infiltration rat:E!S in this arE!a ranged from as <br />little as 0.05 inches per hour, Easi: of 1:he town of Kiowa up <br />to 6.3 inches per hour South of Kiowa. Average subbasin in- <br />fil tration rates sele!cted for this r'~gion ranged from 0.68 to <br />0.91 inches per hour. <br /> <br />A-1.2 Calibration <br />Since the peak discharges (It: Wiggins were set by the CWCB, <br />the HEC-1 model was calibrated to those quantities. <br />Calibration was accomplished by varying infiltration rates <br />within limits set by the infiltration map. The discharge <br />values provided by t:he CWCB were developed by FEMA and were <br />published on Page 5 of the "wiggins I) & M Manual, 1989". <br />It was not possible to match both 'the discharges given for <br />Wiggins and .those given for Highway 52. In the report pro- <br />vided by the CWCB, peak discharges at Wiggins were always <br />higher than those at Highway :;2, Using the HEC-l model, at- <br />tenuation in the lower basin resulted in peak discharges that <br />were actually lower at Wiggins than at Hiqhway 52. The at- <br />tenuation in flood peaks, est:imated with the HEC-1 model are <br />listed in Table A-l as follmvs: <br /> <br />28 <br />