My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03286
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03286
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:50 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:37:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Adams
Community
Wheat Ridge, Arvada
Stream Name
Lower Clear Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning
Date
10/1/1981
Prepared For
Adams County
Prepared By
UDFCD
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />C-l <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />APPENDIX C <br /> <br />It is important that the criteria used for design be WE'll-conceived, so as to <br />maximize the benefits to be obtained from each alternative and to insure that <br />the major drainage system will operate as intended. The design criteria <br />utilized for this planning study are based on those contained in the Urban <br />Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume Nos. 1 and 2 (Reference 40), and other <br />acceptable criteria for the Denver metropolitan arp.a. It should be recogniz- <br />ed that the following criteria are general and are intended for a wide <br />variety of streiJ11 regimes. Lower Cl ear Creek may have many reaches which <br />have a natural cobble bed, therefore, consideration must be given to each <br />reach of the creek to determine which design criteria are applicable. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED STRUCTURAL CRITERIA FOR MAJOR DRAINAGEWAYS <br /> <br />STRUCTURAL CRITERIA <br /> <br />1. Grass-Lined Artificial Channels. Design will generally be based on chan- <br />nel s having natural waterway h}{lraul ic and appearance characteristics. <br />They should be aesthetically designed to the local environment and useful <br />for local recreation continuous along the channel. Criteria include: <br /> <br />o A maximum average design velocity of 7.0 feet per second (fps) for the <br />100-year storm in accordance with the Denver Regional Council of <br />Governments criteria for different grass and soil types. <br /> <br />o Maximum depth on overbank of up to 5 feet. <br /> <br />o 4:1 channel side slopes; however, where developllent exists and right- <br />of-way is a problem the slopes may be 3:1. <br /> <br />o Centerline curvature of twice the top width. <br /> <br />o Freeboard equal to velocity head (expressed in feet) plus 0.5 feet, <br />but no less than 1.0 foot and not to exceed 3.0 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.