My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03149
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD03149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:27 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:29:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Gilpin
Community
Central City
Stream Name
Eureka and Nevada Gulches
Basin
South Platte
Title
FEMA LOMR Application Hydrologic and Hydraulic Study
Date
10/1/1991
Prepared For
Central City
Prepared By
RMC
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Eureka Gulch into two (2) separate watersheds in order examine the <br />effects of a. reservoir at the Dorothy Lee Placer. In this study and <br />the detailed RMC feasibil ity study, watersheds were divided into <br />seventeen (17) subwatersheds. Estimated runoffs from these areas, <br />along with flow routing and combinations, provides runoff rates at <br />points of specific interest. <br /> <br />B. Criteri a <br /> <br />Precipitation depths for storms of various return periods are published <br />in NOAA Atlas II. (See Reference No.3 in the Bibliography.) Some- <br />times more site specific information is available which may differ from <br />the NOAA Atlas II, and such i nformat i on should be cons i dered. For <br />Central City, no other suitable data was found, so used in this study <br />were the NOAA Atlas II values for May through October (whi ch time <br />period essentially el iminates snowfall). The SCS unit hydrograph <br />method was used to estimate storm runoffs, with data obtained by using <br />guidelines presented in SCS TR-55 and NEH-4. (See Reference Numbers <br />4 and 5, respectively, in the Bibliography.) Comparing estimated <br />runoff results using the 2-hour, 6-hour, and 24-hour type IIa rainfall <br />distribution, it was determined that the latter resulted in the higher <br />estimated peak runoffs, and therefore was used in this study. The SCS <br />unit hydrograph method was util ized in the U. S. Army Corps of <br />Engineers HEC-l computer program. (See Reference No. 6 in the <br />Bibliography.) The selected design storms for analyses were the 2-year <br />(for calibration purposes), 10-year, 50-year, 100-year, and 500-year <br />storm events. No reduction in precipitation depths were allowed for <br />size of watershed area, and the 500-year rainfall depth was determined <br />by extrapolation. <br /> <br />C. Procedures <br /> <br />1. Appendix "A", Rainfall Results and Distributions <br /> <br />Research was performed in an effort to establish realistic <br />precipitation data. The largest storm runoff event of recent years <br />was due to a series of July storms in 1975. According to newspaper <br />accounts researched by Brian Hyde of CWCB, on July 8, a downpour <br />hit the Spring/Nevada Gulch area resulting in water and sediment <br />flooding Main Street and entering some buildings. On July 20, a <br />slightly worse storm hit causing overflow from the Nevada flume <br />with water and sediment flooding Nevada, Main, and Gregory Streets. <br />On July 23, a severe storm event occurred which left 3'-4' of <br />sediment deposited on Main Street. The July 23rd storm is recorded <br />not only by newspaper but in the minds of local residents. Unfort- <br />unately, the precipitation station in Central City from 1956 to <br />1977 was not continuously in operation, and no data exists for July <br />of 1975. For comparative information only, records for Idaho <br />Springs and Nederland, the two (2) closest gauges, were researched. <br />It was 1 earned that there were no records for July in Idaho <br />Springs, and none or negligible rainfall amounts fell in Nederland. <br /> <br />Information was sought from NOAA, USGS, CWCB, the State climato- <br />logist, a meteorlogist, and a special hydrological project called <br />ENSTAR performed by the University of Colorado for Niwot and <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.