Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />'. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />between Lowry Air Force Base (AFB) and Sand Creek. <br /> <br /> <br />The construction of the Kelly Road dam and detention <br /> <br /> <br />pond was recommended to alleviate the run-off from <br /> <br /> <br />the large paved areas of the AFB. As a result of this <br /> <br /> <br />report, construction of Kelly Road dam was completed <br /> <br /> <br />in November, 1953. <br /> <br />stormwater from the area south of the AFB to the <br /> <br /> <br />lower drainage basin, and the inadequacy of drainage <br /> <br /> <br />capacity in the lower basin, were not resolved. <br /> <br />November, 1971. "Adequacy Report, Kelly Road Detention <br /> <br /> <br />Dam" (Omaha District, Corps of Engineers) . <br /> <br /> <br />The report concluded that by 1985 urban development <br /> <br /> <br />upstream of Kelly Road will have lowered the protection <br /> <br /> <br />level of the detention structure to a lO-year frequency. <br /> <br />June, 1973. "Analysis Concerning Import of Storm Sewer <br /> <br /> <br />Proposals by City of Aurora on Drainage Within Boundaries <br /> <br /> <br />of Lowry Air Force Base" (Omaha District, Corps of <br /> <br /> <br />Engineers) . <br /> <br /> <br />Two proposals for storm sewer construction by Aurora <br /> <br /> <br />affecting drainage conditions on Lowry Air Force Base <br /> <br /> <br />were reviewed. One proposal for the diversion of a <br /> <br /> <br />drainage area into the AFB was not acceptable because <br /> <br /> <br />of the imposition of a demand on the Kelly Road dam <br /> <br /> <br />storage capacity which it is not designed to handle. <br /> <br /> <br />The other proposal for construction of storm drains <br /> <br /> <br />within the area contiguous to the AFB is viewed nega- <br /> <br /> <br />tively; however, it is recognized that there is no <br /> <br /> <br />authority to prevent the drain systems from being con- <br /> <br /> <br />structed. <br /> <br />December, 1971. "Reconnaissance Investigation, Westerly <br /> <br /> <br />Creek, Colorado" (Omaha District, Corps of Engineers). <br /> <br /> <br />The report found that a potential project consisting <br /> <br /> <br />of detention storage above the Highline Canal and <br /> <br /> <br />channel improvement from East Alameda Avenue to the <br /> <br /> <br />confluence of Westerly Creek with Sand Creek would <br /> <br /> <br />economically relieve existing and potential flood <br /> <br /> <br />problems in the drainage basin. The report recommenda- <br /> <br /> <br />tions were not implemented. <br /> <br />April, 1973. "Master Drainage Plan, Aurora, Colorado" <br /> <br /> <br />(Nelson, Haley, Patterson & Quirk, Inc.). <br /> <br /> <br />Proposed flood water conveyance and detention facilities <br /> <br /> <br />for the city of Aurora are described in detail in this <br /> <br /> <br />report. However, the problems associated with conveying <br /> <br />October, 1973. "Preliminary Analysis for Urban Drainage <br /> <br /> <br />Master Planning of the Highline Canal" (Leonard Rice <br /> <br /> <br />Consulting Water Engineers, Inc.). <br /> <br /> <br />This report, as it pertains to Westerly Creek, demon- <br /> <br /> <br />strated that there is essentially no drainage capacity <br /> <br /> <br />in the Highline Canal (primarily an irrigation facility) <br /> <br /> <br />for Westerly Creek flows because of inflow to the canal <br /> <br /> <br />from other basins. <br />