My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03000
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD03000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:23:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Stream Name
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Title
Water and Related Land Resources Management Study Volume V - Appendix H
Date
7/14/1980
Prepared For
South Platte and Tributaries
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Review of the Report <br /> <br />As a part of the coordination activities for the Westerly <br /> <br /> <br />Creek studies, copies of a draft of this report, accompanied by a <br /> <br /> <br />Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), were circulated for <br /> <br /> <br />review and comment. Copies of all comments received and <br /> <br /> <br />responses to these comments are included in chapter 4 of the <br /> <br /> <br />Technical Appendix. The following paragraphs summarize the <br /> <br />comments. <br /> <br />The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, the city of <br /> <br /> <br />Aurora, and the city and county of Denver all support the <br /> <br /> <br />selected plan but would prefer a lower financial participation by <br /> <br /> <br />local ir.terests. They feel it inappropriate to apply the <br /> <br /> <br />President's proposed cost-sharing policies until Congress has <br /> <br /> <br />acted upon the proposal. Corps of Engineers interim guidance on <br /> <br /> <br />the implementation of the president's proposal requires that the <br /> <br /> <br />President's proposed cost-sharing policies be incorporated into <br /> <br /> <br />reporting officers' recommendations for Federal participation. <br /> <br />Similarly, the State of Colorado supports the plan but does <br /> <br /> <br />not favor the President's proposed cost-sharing policies. The <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife suggests vegetative plantings in <br /> <br /> <br />connection with the improvements on Lowry Air Force Base. <br /> <br /> <br />Although it is the Corps' position that mitigation is not <br /> <br /> <br />required because the loss of habitat would not be significant, <br /> <br /> <br />further consideration can be given to vegetative planting during <br /> <br />the advanced engineering and design stage. This would also have <br /> <br />to be ~oordinated with the Air Force. The Colorado Historical <br /> <br /> <br />Society anticipates no impacts to archeological resources or <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />68 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.