My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02939
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02939
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:25:52 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:21:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Otero
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Otero County Storm Water Drainage Improvements
Date
2/6/2002
Prepared For
Otero County
Prepared By
Department of Engineering, Land Use and Building
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Otero ComIIy l'Ige <} 216fJ1JtJ2 <br /> <br />a. How was the Estimated Start Date determined? I.....ed it would take 30 days for <br />. approval of the project. therefore it is esti...ted theprojeet will start by Mareh 7, 2002. <br /> <br />b, How was the Estimllted Completion Date determined? I...med that IOme of the <br />work would aeed to be done after the irriptioD seaIOR is over; therefore I estimated <br />the projeet would be complete by Deeember 31, 2002. <br /> <br />B. Maintenance Schedule (Over Useful Life of Project) is listed on the attached 11404 Mitigation Project <br />Work Schedule" Form attaclJed after part 13 at tab 4 <br /> <br />PART 8 <br />Discussion of Alternatives <br /> <br />A Discuss mitigation Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Discuss in Detail the Do Nothing Altemalive: If DothiDg is done the water wiD continue to <br />flood and damage these properties two to three times a year and very possibly the flooding <br />wiD eaue the lose ofllumanUfe. <br /> <br />B- <br />. <br /> <br />2, Discuss in Detail Alternative #2: Build flood deteDtioDs pond above the flooding areas. <br /> <br />JustifY selection of this project over any oftbe above alternatives: The proposed project will cost a <br />fraetion of Alternative II 2 aDd it ean be completed withia a year. Iflater on .oney becomes <br />avaUable for the deteDtions poncb the improve.eDts of this project will continue to bellefits the <br />residents during local stol'llls. <br /> <br />PART 9l <br />Project Compliance Assurances <br />A. Code Compliance: <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />Will the project meet all Dlltional, state, or local codes, and standards applicable for the local <br />jurisdiction? Yes <br />a. Building: NIl., no baildiDp wiD be erected. <br />b, Consttuction: The projeet wiD design and built with the corporation of COOT. <br />c,Public Notification: Yes - if required <br />d Floodplain Development: Projeet is in compliance with aU zouiug ordinances. <br /> <br />2. Explain needed excmptionslvariances to any of the above listed Codes & Standards. <br />No exemptioDl or variances win be needed. <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />B. National Flood Insurance Program (NFlP): <br />1. Is the project's location jurisdiction/community participating in the NFIP? <br />. Yes, and they are iD good "'adiug. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.