Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5.4 <br /> <br />flood Insurance Rate Map Description <br /> <br />."; <br /> <br />The Flood Insurance Rate Map for Boulder is, for insurance <br />purposes, the principal product of the flood Insurance Study. <br />This map contains the official delineation of flood insurance <br />zones and base flood elevations. Base flood elevation lines show <br />the locations of the expected whole-foot water-surface elevations <br />of the base (lOa-year) flood. The base flood elevations and zone <br />numbers are used by insurance agents, in conjunction with <br />structural elevations and characteristics, to assign actuarial <br />insurance rates to structures and contents insured under the NFIP. <br /> <br />,., <br /> <br />6.0 OTHER STUDIES <br /> <br />To ensure the reliability of the results of this study, the flood <br />Insurance study flows were compared with flows developed in other <br />studies in the area. A number of floodplain hydrology studies in the <br />north metro/Boulder area were examined for use in this report. Reports <br />used for comparison purposes were selected based on having drainage <br />areas of less than 10 square miles and the absence of upstream flow <br />regulation (flood-storage reservoirs). <br /> <br />A chart was developed to compare the flows for this study with flows <br />developed in three studies, all of which were prepared for UDFCD by <br />Wright-McLaughlin Engineers (References 4, l5, and 16). The Lena Gulch <br />flows (Reference 16) are based on future (developed) conditions. The <br />other studies are based on existing conditions, with proposed channel <br />improvements throughout Boulder. All three studies are based on <br />previous rainfall data and unit hydrograph procedures. <br /> <br />,---,. <br /> <br />An approximate upper and lower boundary was drawn based on the above <br />studies. flows developed in this area are expected to plot close to the <br />upper limit (the final flows will be somewhat lower due to more precise <br />stream routing). The flows for Bear Canyon, Skunk, Wonderland, Twomile, <br />and Goose Creeks all plot very well on the chart. The EImers Twomile <br />Creek flow plots on the high side. The basin is completely urbanized <br />and channel ized; therefore, the flow seems reasonable. The Fourmi le <br />Canyon Creek flow plots very Iowan the chart. The Fourmile Canyon <br />Creek basin, from the mouth to the canyon narrows, is 30,000 feet and <br />drains only 1,800 acres. This gives an average width of 2,600 feet, for <br />a basin width-to-length ratio of l: l1. This unusual situation provides <br />for extensive attenuation of peak flows. If the proposed channelization <br />of fourmile Canyon Creek is constructed in the future, the peak flows <br />would be comparable to those shown in a 1969 UDfCD Study (Reference 4). <br />The drainage area values used for the upstream basin of fourmile Canyon <br />Creek are comparable to those in the UDfCD study. <br /> <br />eJ_ <br /> <br />33 <br />