Laserfiche WebLink
<br />AGENDA <br /> <br />TumerColIie@'Braden Inc. <br /> <br />MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />First Creek OSP and FlLill <br />(progress Meeting) <br />Time: 2:00 <br />Date: February 29, 2000 <br />Location: Urban Drainage & Flood Control District <br /> <br />Subject: <br />Job No.: <br /> <br />Lower First Creek and Direct Flow Area 0055 Outfall Study <br />35-05096-040 <br /> <br />Place: Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Offices <br />Date & Time: 2/29/002:00 PM <br /> <br />(I) <br /> <br />DFA 55 Tributaries (Existing Alignments) <br /> <br />Attendees: <br /> <br />Bill DeGroot (UDFCD) Stephen Smith (RVO-RJ\1A-USFWS) <br />Edward Stafford (Commerce City) Rick Moser (TCB) <br />David Center (TCB) Tim Kilgannon (RMA.) <br />Jim Pearce (RMA) Rich Ommert (TeB) <br />Wes Gardner (Gardner/Kushnriff Real Estate) <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />Alternatives Feedback <br /> <br />Preparer: <br /> <br />Da v id Center <br /> <br />Date: 2/29/00 <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />Detention VIS of Hwy-2 <br /> <br />The purpose of the meeting was to report on progress on the Outfall Planning and Flood Hazard Area <br />Delineation Study for tbe lower First Creek Watershed. <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />FHAD <br /> <br />(5) <br /> <br />Other Issues <br /> <br />DFA 0055 Tributaries (Existing Alignments) <br />Dave described the existing alignments for the Elm, Birch and Arsenal North drainageways. The Elm <br />drainage stops at the O'Brian Canal where it is retained on-site. The Elm is proposed (by engineers for the <br />Mountain View Industrial Park) to drain to the proposed Arsenal North Drainageway, which follows <br />along Havana 51. to First Creek. <br /> <br />(6) <br /> <br />Next Meetingl Adjournment <br /> <br />At the direction of the sponsors, the Elm alignment will be shown going through the O'Brian Canal and <br />Burlington Ditch and meeting with the Birch Drainageway. The Arsenal North will flow through the <br />O'Brian and Burlington and confluence with the Elm Drainageway. It must be noted that the current <br />constructed Elm channel is insufficient to convey the 100-yr future land use runoff from the Elm and <br />Arsenal North Drainageways. Additionally, increases to the Birch channel cross section would be <br />required downstream ofthe confluence with the Elm. If the channels on the Elm and Birch are not <br />upsized a residual floodplain would exist along those drainageways. <br /> <br />The alignment along First Creek can be changed from the Burlington Ditch to the Belle Creek <br />development. The new alignments will try to keep the channel within the designated floodplain. <br /> <br />Detention Upstream of SH-2 <br />At the request of UDFCD TCB investigated the use of two detention basins upstream of SH-2. One 350 <br />ac-ft basin at 961h Ave. would reduce the base model two to ten-year peak flows to existing model <br />conditions. The second basin would reduce the 1 OO-year peak flow to approximately 31 OO-cfs. This <br />would require approximately 500 ac-ft of storage. The location for this storage could be at the proposed <br />relocated O'Brian Canal, SH-2, or an enlarged Maul Reservoir. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />