Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,. <br />I <br /> <br />time of concentration, and "A" is the drainage area in acres, The areas (A) of the four basins <br />were estimated by planimetering the delineated basins from the 1967 quad maps. The runoff <br />coefficient (C) was estimated to be 0,41 for all basins assuming a 100-year design frequency and <br />undeveloped pasture/range land with flat slopes (0 to 2 percent). In order to estimate the rainfall <br />intensity (i), the times of concentration for the four basins were first estimated using SCS average <br />velocity charts and normal depth calculations, A rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curve for <br />Sioux City, Iowa (Iowa Department of Transportation) was used to obtain the 100-year rainfall <br />intensities for the computed times of concentration. Application of the rational method with the <br />above parameters yielded peak discharge values which are shown on plate 2. <br /> <br />Culverts for the interior drainage were assumed to be cim1lar reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and <br />were sized with nomographs assuming inlet control. Due to the flat topography behind the levee, <br />a maximum headwater to diameter of pipe (HWID) ratio of 1.0 was assumed so as to minimize <br />the backwater ponding depth, The conceptual culvert sizes and locations are shown on plate 2, <br />The culvert outlets would be fitted with flap gates to prevent floodwater in the Main Ditch from <br />backing up through the pipes during high stage events. The ultimate culvert locations will have <br />to be determined during final design. If possible, the inlets of the pipes should be located in <br />sump conditions to maximize pipe capacities and to lTIinimi7e ponding depths behind the levees. <br />The purpose of the cursory interior drainage analysis was to develop conceptual facilities and <br />preliminary construction costs. The analysis includes assumptions that may not be suitable for <br />final design purposes, Additional analyses for interior drainage facilities would be required for <br />final design. <br /> <br />Cost Estimates <br />The preliminary construction costs for the proposed lOO-year and 500-year facilities are <br />presented in table 2. The preliminary costs estimates include the major items required for <br />construction of the proposed facilities. It was assumed that acceptable fill material for the levees <br />could be obtained from the excavation of the channel improvements and the new diversion <br />channel. For the 500-year levees, some fill material would be required from an unspecified <br />borrow site. Miscellaneous items such as mobilization, clearing and grubbing, erosion <br />protection, relocation of utilities, seeding, and restoration were not included. A 25 percent <br />contingency was, however, included in the total estimated construction costs. <br /> <br />10 <br />