Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4.3.4 Comparative Analysis <br /> <br />A limited amount of information was available for performing a comparative analysis to <br />provide an understanding of historic stream stability. CDOT had information at the U.S. 40 <br />bridge from their inspection program, and it was evident that the channel bed had adjusted both <br />up and down over the past 40 + years (Appendix I). The maximum bed degradation appears to <br />be about 7 to 8 ft in the vicinity of the piers. Their latest information indicated that in addition <br />to the degradation, a 7-ft scour hole had developed downstream of the west pier and was <br />threatening the footing. <br /> <br />No historic aerial photos were obtained to make a reasonable comparison of lateral channel <br />movement. The aerial photo taken during the 1997 flooding, indicates there has been a lot of <br />channel adjustment in the area upstream of Section 7. According to property owners, there is <br />an indication that the channel has migrated, or attempted to migrate westward. From <br />discussions with CDOT maintenance personnel, the channel has also eroded the east bank <br />upstream of the U.S. 40 bridge. This is supported by the previous stability efforts observed in <br />the field, but no data were available to quantify the extent of the migration. <br /> <br />4.3.5 Bank Instability <br /> <br />Along the lower Elk River, bank stability is a reflection of the soils present, the impact of <br />channel hydraulics on the toe of the bank, vertical loads, seepage forces to which the bank may <br />be subjected, the channel's adjustment to both natural and man-made controls, and past <br />dredging activity. Major failure mechanisms include block-type failures where more cohesive <br />materials are present, and sloughing of the bank due to undercutting and removal of material <br />from the toe area. Cattle trampling also factors into bank instability for the upper portions of <br />the study reach. From field observations, bank angles along the study reach appeared to range <br />between about 40 degrees to 90 degrees. Many of the steeper banks occurred at the outside of <br />meander bends, opposite either channel deposits or debris blockage, or opposite natural and <br />man-made controls. <br /> <br />4.3.6 Conclusions <br /> <br />No formal stability analysis was performed as part of this study. But from the geomorphic <br />analysis, it would appear that the channel is quite active along the lower Elk River. From the <br />limited survey information, bed slopes range from 0.002 Nft to 0.007 Nft. The steepest area <br />being in the vicinity of the sharp meander bend upstream of U.S. 40. With the large cobble <br />present in the bed along this reach, it would appear that the channel is in the process of self- <br />armoring. The scour occurring at the U.S. 40 bridge and evidence of headcutting just upstream <br />of the U.S. 40 bridge indicates the potential for some additional degradation to take place. This <br />could result in the undermining of bank stability measures that have been implemented to date <br />to protect both the bridge and private property. Also, active bank erosion is taking place <br />throughout the study reach. The areas of greatest concern are where existing structures, both <br />public and private, are being threatened by the shifting river. <br /> <br />28 <br />