My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02750
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02750
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 11:49:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:06:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
125
County
Routt
Stream Name
Elk River
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Title
Streambank Stabilization Limited Watershed
Date
11/1/1999
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
ICON Engineering, Inc.
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4.3.4 Comparative Analysis <br /> <br />A limited amount of information was available for performing a comparative analysis to <br />provide an understanding of historic stream stability. CDOT had information at the U.S. 40 <br />bridge from their inspection program, and it was evident that the channel bed had adjusted both <br />up and down over the past 40 + years (Appendix I). The maximum bed degradation appears to <br />be about 7 to 8 ft in the vicinity of the piers. Their latest information indicated that in addition <br />to the degradation, a 7-ft scour hole had developed downstream of the west pier and was <br />threatening the footing. <br /> <br />No historic aerial photos were obtained to make a reasonable comparison of lateral channel <br />movement. The aerial photo taken during the 1997 flooding, indicates there has been a lot of <br />channel adjustment in the area upstream of Section 7. According to property owners, there is <br />an indication that the channel has migrated, or attempted to migrate westward. From <br />discussions with CDOT maintenance personnel, the channel has also eroded the east bank <br />upstream of the U.S. 40 bridge. This is supported by the previous stability efforts observed in <br />the field, but no data were available to quantify the extent of the migration. <br /> <br />4.3.5 Bank Instability <br /> <br />Along the lower Elk River, bank stability is a reflection of the soils present, the impact of <br />channel hydraulics on the toe of the bank, vertical loads, seepage forces to which the bank may <br />be subjected, the channel's adjustment to both natural and man-made controls, and past <br />dredging activity. Major failure mechanisms include block-type failures where more cohesive <br />materials are present, and sloughing of the bank due to undercutting and removal of material <br />from the toe area. Cattle trampling also factors into bank instability for the upper portions of <br />the study reach. From field observations, bank angles along the study reach appeared to range <br />between about 40 degrees to 90 degrees. Many of the steeper banks occurred at the outside of <br />meander bends, opposite either channel deposits or debris blockage, or opposite natural and <br />man-made controls. <br /> <br />4.3.6 Conclusions <br /> <br />No formal stability analysis was performed as part of this study. But from the geomorphic <br />analysis, it would appear that the channel is quite active along the lower Elk River. From the <br />limited survey information, bed slopes range from 0.002 Nft to 0.007 Nft. The steepest area <br />being in the vicinity of the sharp meander bend upstream of U.S. 40. With the large cobble <br />present in the bed along this reach, it would appear that the channel is in the process of self- <br />armoring. The scour occurring at the U.S. 40 bridge and evidence of headcutting just upstream <br />of the U.S. 40 bridge indicates the potential for some additional degradation to take place. This <br />could result in the undermining of bank stability measures that have been implemented to date <br />to protect both the bridge and private property. Also, active bank erosion is taking place <br />throughout the study reach. The areas of greatest concern are where existing structures, both <br />public and private, are being threatened by the shifting river. <br /> <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.