My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02750
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02750
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 11:49:02 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:06:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
125
County
Routt
Stream Name
Elk River
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Title
Streambank Stabilization Limited Watershed
Date
11/1/1999
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
ICON Engineering, Inc.
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />formation that is fairly well vegetated. Banks on this side are about 5 feet high and bank slopes <br />are more gradual than along the west bank in most areas. Near the upper part of the reach the <br />east bank has evidence of undercutting and appeared to be near vertical. The bar deposits <br />appear to be a mixture of larger cobble and sandy gravels, and bed material seemed to be <br />coarser than in the lower reach. A fairly deep pool exists along the outside of the meander <br />bend, and a pronounced riffle exists near the upstream limit of the protection measures along <br />the west bank. There was evidence of failed bank protection measures that consisted of log <br />bundles and large rounded boulders along the west bank at the upper end of the existing <br />revetment. Two property owners have structures along the west bank. There was evidence of <br />large boulders being stockpiled in the eastern overbank. <br /> <br />Reach 4 (Section 6 to Section 7) - This reach extends from approximately 3,000 ft upstream <br />of U.S. 40 to approximately 3,900 ft upstream of U.S. 40. The channel banks are near vertical <br />in many places with heights between about 4 to 5 ft. Tension cracks were noted along the west <br />bank, and it appeared that block failures had occurred. The west overbank appeared to be <br />relatively low and flat. There was evidence that flows in excess of the channel capacity would <br />be able to spill towards the West Fork of the Elk River. A large point bar exists along about <br />half of the east bank. Towards the upper end of the reach, the east bank became near vertical <br />and a more resistant formation was apparent. Another small irrigation diversion culvert was <br />also located on the east bank near the upper limit of the reach. <br /> <br />Reach 5 (Section 7 to Upstream Limit) - This reach extends from approximately 3,900 ft <br />upstream of U.S. 40 to the upper end of the study reach near the diversion structure for the <br />West Fork. At the lower end of the reach, the east bank rises almost vertically to about 30 ft <br />high. This is along the exposed formation noted in Reach 4. This portion of the river is <br />characterized by numerous bar deposits, both point and mid-channel. At the upper end of this <br />reach, the channel has an almost braided character. Many of the deposits appear to be well <br />vegetated. There was evidence of cattle trampling along the west bank that can contribute to <br />bank instability. This appears to be a segment of the river that has experienced a significant <br />amount of channel adjustment. This may have partially been a result of past dredging efforts <br />within the channel. Stabilization efforts were apparent along the west bank at several locations. <br />A large stockpile of river rock was adjacent to the west bank midway along the reach: A <br />number of old stone jetties and revetment appeared to have been somewhat successful in <br />reclaiming some of the bank just downstream of Section 8. There were several areas where <br />higher flows would be able to spill from the channel and either rejoin the channel further <br />downstream or continue westward toward the West Fork of the Elk River. Between Section 8 <br />and the West Fork diversion structure, there was a low area paralleling the channel where it <br />appeared some type of heavy equipment had come through and cut into the channel. Further <br />evidence of heavy equipment disturbance was upstream of the diversion structure along the <br />western portion of the channel. Dredged material appeared to have been pushed up along the <br />bank in this vicinity. Additional stone spur dikes also exist on the west bank upstream of the <br />West Fork diversion structure. <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.